NavigationBanners![]()
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 370 guests online.
|
RKBA ResponsibilitiesSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 2002-03-14 10:16.
by Bill St. Clair
The Albany Times Union printed a letter I wrote about the right to keep and bear arms: Constitution enshrines right to carry weapon That's a nice concise description of your rights, but it doesn't describe the other side of the coin. With rights come responsibilities. This article touches on some of them. Though government may not mandate safety training, if you don't know why every gun is always loaded, no matter how many times you've checked that it isn't, you need to learn how to handle your firearm safely. Contact the NRA, your local gun club, or almost any responsible gun owner. Safety is rule number one of firearm ownership. I learned it as a pup at my father's knee. At the very least, read and learn by heart Jeff Cooper's Rules of Gun Safety. Summary: Rule I: All guns are always loaded If you intend to carry, it's a really good idea to get professional training in when and how to use your firearm for self defense. Some of the big names in this business are Massad Ayoob's Lethal Force Institute in New Hampshire, Jeff Cooper's Gunsite in Arizona, Ignatius Piazza's Front Sight in Nevada, and Clint Smith's Thunder Ranch in Texas, but there are hundreds of others. Books and videos can help, but there is no substitute for hands-on training. If you're not willing and able to use your self-defense weapon responsibly, don't carry it. Though government has no business restricting your right to obtain, own, and carry firearms, when you take your gun out of your pocket or holster in public, it becomes their business. Except in defense of person or property, pointing a gun at someone is assault with a deadly weapon. Pulling the trigger is attempted murder. Serious felonies. No matter which fancy uniform or funny hat you're wearing or how many people voted for you. Guns and alcohol don't mix. Ever. Government has no business restricting your rights, but surprise, they already have. Though most of the thousands of existing weapons laws are blatantly unconstitutional, there are plenty of cops eager to enforce them. If you decide that your rights to life, liberty, and property are incompatible with the local laws, I recommend thinking hard about how you will deal with it. Move, disobey, or lick the jack boots. The choices are not pleasant. Whatever you do, make plenty of noise about your need to do this thinking. You shouldn't have to. None of us should. add new comment | quote | 1951 reads
|
BlogrollMike Vanderboegh
QuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh Also from The Atlanta Declaration: ... like going to the bathroom, breathing, eating, sleeping, or making love, it turns out that self-defense is a bodily function one cannot safely or effectively delegate to a second party. -- L. Neil Smith This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion. -- Vin Suprynowicz The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 10 hours ago
4 days 21 hours ago
4 days 23 hours ago
5 days 21 hours ago
6 days 11 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 6 days ago