NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1976 guests online.
|
Einstein's PuzzleSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 2005-12-26 08:35.
[from
this Clairefiles Forum thread]
Einstien supposedly created the following puzzle: There are 5 houses in 5 different colours. In each house lives a person of a different nationality. The 5 owners drink a certain type of beverage, smoke a certain brand of cigar, and keep a certain pet. Using the clues below can you determine who owns the fish?
Here's my solution. Stop reading now if you want to work it out yourself.
First off, it's necessary to assume that the "first house", in which the Norwegian lives, is on the far left. I haven't worked it out if you assume that it's on the far right. Since the green house owner drinks coffee, the green house cannot be in the middle, as its owner drinks milk. The second house is blue, hence, since the green house is on the immediate left of the white house, it must be in position 4 (counted from the left). Since the brit lives in the red house, the Norwegian must live in the yellow house. This means that the houses are in the following order, with known relationships in parentheses: yellow (Norwegian, Dunhill), blue (horses), red (Brit, milk), green (coffee), white And here are the remaining clues, shortened for ease off use, and organized as smoke, pet, drink, and nationality:
Since the Blue Master smoker drinks beer, he must live in either the blue or white house. Assume he lives in the blue house. Then Blend is in the green house (it can't be next to water in the red or white), the Prince-smoking German is in the white house with his water, and the Brit smokes Pall Mall: yellow (Norwegian, Dunhill), blue (Blue Master, beer, horses), red (Brit, Pall Mall, milk, birds), green (Blend, coffee), white (German, Prince, water, cats) Now the Swede and his dogs must go in the green house, so there's no place for the Dane with his tea. Our Blue Master assumption must have been incorrect. Backing up, The Blue Master smoker must be in the white house with his beer: yellow (Norwegian, Dunhill), blue(horses), red(Brit, milk), green (coffee), white (Blue Master, beer) Now Blend has to be either in the blue or red house (it can't be next to water in green or white). Assume its in the red house. Then water is drunk in the blue house, cats are kept in the green house, the Swede keeps his dogs in the white house, and once again there's no place for the Dane and his tea. So, back up once again. Blend must be smoked in the blue house, the Norwegian drinks water, the Dane must live in the blue house with his tea, and the German must smoke his Prince in the green house. yellow(Norwegian, Dunhill, water), blue(Dane, Blend, tea, horses), red(Brit, milk), green (German, Prince, coffee), white(Blue Master, beer) The remaining unused clues are:
So the Brit must smoke Pall Mall and keep birds, the Norwegian must keep cats, and the Swede must live in the white house with his dogs: yellow (Norwegian, Dunhill, water, cats), blue (Dane, Blend, tea, horses), red (Brit, Pall Mall, milk, birds), green (German, Prince, coffee), white (Swede, Blue Master, beer, dogs) Conclusion: the German owns the fish. add new comment | quote | 1606 reads
|
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 20 hours ago
3 days 2 hours ago
3 days 3 hours ago
1 week 4 hours ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago