NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 954 guests online.
Online users:
|
Linda Hamilton Rally Report, 11 April 2001Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 2004-02-19 16:58.
Back on March 6, I pointed to a story entitled
Massachusetts Police: "Don't shoot!". It was the story of how
Linda Hamilton, while driving near North Adams, Massachusetts was
nearly driven off the road by a crazy trucker. She displayed her
licensed handgun, in the holster, which caused the trucker to back
off. Then she, not he, got in trouble with the police. Two lady
highway patrol officers searched her car without her permission and
stole her gun.
Last night, I got an email from Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), Help Stop Prosecution of Self-Defending Woman. Linda was to be arraigned this morning on charges of assault with a dangerous weapon. The email asked people within driving distance to come. I live about 45 minutes from North Adams, so I drove out there. This is the story of my morning. Linda Hamilton Rally Pictures is the best of the pictures I took while there. We were asked to show up at 8:15. I got to town at about 7:30, went to a local health food cafe for coffee and muffin, and proceded on foot to the court house. The sign on the building said "City Hall", so I was unsure of whether it was the court house. As I was walking around outside, a car stopped, and the man inside asked me where the court house was. "I think it's right here", said I. Then I went inside and asked two guys in suits whether it was the court house. It was. I went back out, introduced myself to the man, and discovered that he, as I, was there for Linda's rally. His name was Peter Ulan. He had come with his wife all the way from North Reading, north of Boston, at least a 2 hour drive. He lived for 47 years in the Soviet Union, and had brought his own sign. The JPFO letter said that they'd have signs there, so I didn't bring one. Peter was incredibly animated. He was out in the street handing out leaflets, directing the rest of us to be more active, quite something. Turns out that his son had a similar incident in Boston. His son is a marine, and has a license to carry a concealed handgun. When he was standing in a Cambridge street, someone pushed him from behind. When he turned around, he noticed the perp reaching into his pocket, so he brandished his weapon. This was enough to convince the perp to back off, as it usually is. Peter's son has been in the court system for a year, also on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon. They go to trial in June. Peter, his wife, and I waited around for a while, then I saw a truck with signs on it saying, "Self Defense is NOT a crime! Theft of a weapon IS a crime!". I went over and introduced myself to Linda and Russ Hamilton. I congratulated Linda on her behavior, and gave her a hug. She was quite nervous, as I would have been in her situation. They went into the court house to talk with their lawyer. People slowly gathered, and we eventually had 10 or 15 people holding signs, passing out leaflets, and getting occasionally scolded by the 2 or 3 North Adams police that came to keep an eye on us. One guy came from half-way up in Vermont, probably an hour and a half drive. A couple of friends of the Hamiltons were also there, but I didn't write down their names. I got a couple of thumbs up from drivers who saw my sign. Shortly after 9:00, Linda, Russ, and her lawyers came out of the court house. Linda was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and released on her own recognizance. She has a pre-trial hearing scheduled for May 9, unless the state decides to indict her, in which case she'll have to go to the superior court in Pittsfield. I asked her to keep me informed. She does NOT yet have her gun back. I was surprised that the judge didn't laugh the case out of court and tell the police officers not to waste everyone's time. I can't imagine any jury finding her guilty. I think Linda should get a medal, the trucker should be thrown in jail for a good long time, and the cops who stole her gun should lose their badges. add new comment | quote | 1137 reads
|
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
3 days 4 hours ago
4 days 10 hours ago
4 days 11 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
3 weeks 15 hours ago
3 weeks 6 days ago