NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 798 guests online.
|
Pinchas ZukermanSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 2008-08-18 05:25.
On Saturday morning, my family, and a couple of friends, went to Tanglewood to see the dress rehearsal for the Boston Symphony Orchestra's concert of yesterday afternoon. The Saturday morning dress rehearsals are a relatively inexpensive way to see high-brow music for a lot less money ($17, 12 and under free). My wife went early with a regular to these rehearsals, and ran for seats when they opened the doors at 8:30 (performance at 10:30). She saved us front row seats. The "front row" for these rehearsals is about 10 rows back, leaving a buffer zone for the conductor to talk with the orchestra, but they were still incredible seats. Their program was Rapsodie espagnole by Ravel, Violin Concerto No. 1 by Bruch, and Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov. Pinchas Zukerman (wikipedia) played the violin solo for the Bruch on the "Dushkin" Guarnerius del Gesù violin of 1742. I enjoy my recordings of Itzhak Perlman, a close friend of Mr. Zukerman, playing his Soil Stradivarius violin, but there is nothing like live music. To say that I thought I had died and gone to heaven would be an understatement. The Bruch is not a particularly notey piece, though it had it's fast parts, but Mr. Zukerman handled it all, with seeming ease. And the sweetness of the sound that he evinced from his violin was a wonder to behold. I did not cry, as I have done before at a concert, but I closed my eyes in rapture and opened them wide in wonder. At one point he motioned to the string bass section to get louder. He even made kicking motions with his foot. "Kick it! Kick it!" Hehe. What a heavenly experience! Thank you, Mr. Zukerman. add new comment | quote | 222 reads
( categories: Entertainment )
|
BlogrollLewRockwell.comQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
2 days 11 hours ago
5 days 3 hours ago
5 days 14 hours ago
1 week 3 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
2 weeks 4 days ago
2 weeks 4 days ago
2 weeks 4 days ago