NavigationBanners![]()
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 512 guests online.
Online users:
|
G20 Protest Coverage reimaginedSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Sat, 2009-09-26 04:40.
Xaq Fixx at Fr33Agents - the jack-booted thugs were out in force in Pittsburg yesterday. Xaq describes police state Amerika perfectly. Entire post copied below. I predict that the terrorists won't stop until the people eradicate them. Yesterday a large group of Americans gathered to celebrate and practice their constitutionally protected rights were attacked by well organized domestic terrorists. The terrorist cells gathered from all over the United States, some, such as the Charlotte, NC based cell, claimed it was training for future attacks. The attackers used a variety of tactics and weapons, including kidnapping, psychological warfare, beatings, chemical weapons, and sound weapons developed for military use in Iraq.
According to reports from terrorist sympathizers in the media and on the internet websites the attackers were motivated by a hatred of the American's freedoms & decadent lifestyle. The terrorist also claim they are justified in their use of violence as they answer to a higher power and that they are not unclean sub-humans like the Americans they attack. The attacks look like they will continue, and spread around the world, with no end in site. The terrorist are also very well funded through a combination of forgery and theft on a global scale. Beyond their attacks at the G20 summit they have known ties to violent monopolies, dictators, the weapons and drug trade and involvement with other terrorist groups across the globe. Adam Meuller, part of the Anti-Terrorist force at MotorhomeDiaries.com, said the key to preventing future attacks is a combination of ignoring the terrorist demands and making it more difficult for them to steal from you through tax resistance and counter economics. add new comment | quote | 420 reads
( categories: Politics )
|
BlogrollMike Vanderboegh
QuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh Also from The Atlanta Declaration: ... like going to the bathroom, breathing, eating, sleeping, or making love, it turns out that self-defense is a bodily function one cannot safely or effectively delegate to a second party. -- L. Neil Smith This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion. -- Vin Suprynowicz The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair |
Recent comments
4 hours 36 min ago
5 hours 15 min ago
15 hours 41 min ago
5 days 5 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 19 hours ago
3 weeks 3 days ago