| Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:34:53
-0600
Dear James,
Yes, the trimmer does make
the transformer more efficient. Not really sure they understand
exactly why.
I've posted some things
since September, including a couple papers or so, and have another one
waiting. My personal situation now is that I take care of my wife 24/7
since her stroke a few months ago, so my time has become very limited
indeed. I cannot stand too long, or walk very far, but can still drive
to the grocery store etc. But we are getting by okay, and I am very
blessed in that my wife did not suffer loss of ability to use her
limbs. She is slowly but steadily recovering, but remains very weak.
She is the love of my life, and simply the best thing that ever
happened to me, so I will take care of her first and foremost, come
hell or high water.
Other than a little work
here and there, the MEG is just about where it was. We are still
working on the follow-on pattern, which is a very difficult one to
prepare in the way it has to be. But we are getting there, slowly. One
of the real problems is that there are not a great many
electrodynamicists who also are experimentalists involving the
geometric phase (which we apply in the form of the Aharonov-Bohm
effect in the MEG). We still are seeking the financing we need, to do
a very difficult year of research before we can adequately model the
highly nonlinear responses, etc., have a fitted math model sufficient
to allow engineering design for scale-up and scale-down, etc. But we
continue to slowly increase our understanding of the unit.
We've also produced a
series of little "fact papers" on thermodynamics, overunity systems
principles, etc. Have fine-tuned them at least three times, and they
are coming along.
We've also posted
information on the Leyton geometry and Leyton's hierarchies of
symmetry. We believe that Leyton's epochal work will indeed provide
the next great breakthrough in physics, chemistry, thermodynamics, and
electrical engineering. We've also nominated the source charge as a
physical nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) system, which produces
continuous negative entropy in accord with the startling theoretical
demonstration shown by Evans and Rondoni, in which case it is the
first ever such physical system (if it does get recognized as such).
If that work holds up, it also totally falsifies the present second
law of thermodynamics, which may be stated as S is greater than or
equal to 0. Instead, it requires revision of the second law to the
form that minus infinity is less than or equal to S less than or equal
to positive infinity. Hopefully the work will hold up; we will see.
These kinds of things do not happen rapidly, however. After the
discovery and proof of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, e.g., it required
physicists some 25 years to finally accept it. Sometimes it requires
50 years before something "much against the grain" is accepted, even
if it is true and experimentally proven.
Have also made some inputs
to another very important program that cannot be discussed because of
a very rigorous nondisclosure agreement.
So we stay as busy as we
are able to, and continue to get out what information we can, as we
can, thanks to some very gracious and hard working folks who make it
possible.
It's going to be a very
hard struggle to get overunity systems allowed to be worked on by the
sharp young grad students and post doctoral scientists, and funded by
the scientific community, but it will come eventually. One notes that
cheap oil has peaked, as far as its supply is concerned. When we moved
against the Taliban in Afghanistan, Putin opened Russia's oil spigots
for us, in a move to become our trusted cheap oil supplier so they
could pump much needed funds into their economy, and that has
actually kept oil from escalating rapidly. The Chinese demand for oil
and energy increases steadily and rapidly, and China has now surpassed
Japan in demand for energy and oil, and has become "user #2"
worldwide, second only to the U.S. That increasing Chinese demand for
oil presages an escalation of the price as time passes along. Just now
OPEC is allowing the OPEC supply to remain at pretty high level, but
is making noises that the next meeting will see them reducing the
supply, to escalate the prices further.
Meanwhile, U.S. power
companies have actually built an excess of generator capacity, but are
still very constrained by overtaxing an inadequate system of grid
transmission lines. And the so-called "power grid control system" is
an abomination, violating almost every major principle of the control
of multiple servo loop systems. Also, allowing speculation in the
marketing of electrical power, so that speculators in sheer greed
redirect much of the power that could be suddenly needed locally in a
bind, and usurp distribution lines in the process, is one of the
severe shortcomings of our distribution system (some one say, one of
its "stupidities"). The distribution system was never planned as a
"shuttling" system in that fashion, but primarily in local demand
modes. The speculative "shuttling" now easily overtaxes the
distribution lines. And when an emergency arises, the "communication"
to the outfit needing to make the change may often be a "courtesy
phone call", if the outfit where the emergency has arisen remember to
make the call. So the grid distribution lines are fragile, easily
overloaded by speculators and "shuttling", leading much too readily to
surges and variations that escape control and require emergency
shutdown of powerplants, refineries, etc.
The big projects now
settled on by Department of Energy are back to pushing Big Nuclear and
Hot Fusion projects. So far as I'm aware, there is not a seriously
funded, serious task anywhere in the National Science Foundation,
National Academy of Sciences, Department of Energy, the Universities,
the National Laboratories, etc. that is directed at obtaining energy
from the vacuum and COP>1.0 electrical power systems. Indeed, I can
find nothing at all in the power engineering field at any of those
agencies, where the discovery of broken symmetry is applied in
electrical power systems, or where the designers and engineers even
recognize that all the EM energy in an electrical circuit comes from
the local vacuum into the local circuit via the charges in that local
circuit. And not from cranking the shaft of the generator, etc.
Electrical engineering still assumes a flat local spacetime (falsified
for any and all energy changes, by general relativity, since 1916) and
an inert vacuum (falsified for at least seven decades in particle
physics. Nowhere in electrical power engineering does it appear to be
taught that modern physics recognizes the charge as consisting of a
dipolarity, with an infinite bare charge in the middle, and surrounded
by an infinite charge of virtual particle (charges) of opposite sign,
bubbling away at a furious rate. Or that the asymmetry of opposite
charges thus applies rigorously to this dipolarity, which explains why
the "source charge as a strange ensemble" extracts virtual energy from
the vacuum, coherently integrates it into observable energy, and
continuously pours out real observable photons in all directions. That
continuous outpouring of real energy establishes and continuously
maintains the associated EM fields and potentials and their energy.
Instead, the classical
Maxwell-Heaviside electrodynamics model and electrical engineering
implicitly assume that every EM field, EM potential, and every joule
of EM energy in the universe is and has been freely created from
nothing at all, by its associated source charges. That assumption of
course is in total violation of the conservation of energy law.
This year we also
published the exact mechanism by which the charge is able to consume
positive entropy in the virtual state, transduce it into positive
energy and also coherently integrate it to observable size, and
re-emit real, observable photons.
Meanwhile, the energy
situation will have variations and ups and downs, but the overall
trend is that the worldwide demand is exceeding the supply of cheap
oil, and it will only get worse. Plus which, the reserves of natural
gas they were counting on for this winter are already evaporating much
faster than originally expected. So if we get much of a winter, the
price of natural gas (which is already rising) will start going
through the roof.
Anyway one cuts the energy
cake, the crisis is not abated, but it is coming on down the railroad
right at us.
When one does a formal
strategic analysis on a nation and its culture, one of the areas
utilized is called "National Style". A nation's National Style reveals
many of its characteristics, knee-jerk reactions, and idiosyncrasies
-- which can be and are exploited by the nation's enemies as
"vulnerabilities". One of our characteristics -- and a serious U.S.
vulnerability -- is that we usually do not react to slowly increasing
threats. We react to the rattler when he strikes at us or bites us,
but not the slowly squeezing boa constrictor. The energy crisis is
just such a boa constrictor, slowly tightening on us.
In the business of abating
the energy crisis, our own national style seems to be dictating that
we have to be bitten and bitten very hard, before we really take it
seriously.
Meanwhile, what Winston
Churchill called the "High Cabal" -- the loose knit odd-balled groups
who between them control much of the world's financial power -- are
very determined to keep things the way there are. The last thing they
wish to see is cheap clean energy from the vacuum, fuel-free. Science
is largely controlled and directed, by controlling its funding and
what the funding can be spent for. In our present science, if one
works on hot fusion, nuclear power plant theory and practice, fuel
cells, etc. one can and will have a good future if one applies
oneself diligently. If one advocates that "silly" energy from the
vacuum, one will be labeled a nut and totally discredited (and
blacklisted or effectively so). The same folks so feverishly
discrediting the free energy research as a "perpetual motion nut" --
themselves continue to advocate an electrical theory that already
accepts that all EM energy is freely created right from nothing at
all. You can draw your own conclusions.
So the way one has to
change science, is to reach the sharp young graduate students and post
doctoral scientists. Once they understand the principles, rigorously
check the references to see that the physics is actually there, and
check the thermodynamics to see that it is there, then gradually some
of them will start working the problem, probably largely on their own
time but some will succeed in getting a bit of funding.
Anytime the "system" will
actually provide a few million dollars of funding for doctoral theses
and post doctoral programs in "energy from the vacuum", then very
rapidly (in two to three years) there will no longer be an energy
crisis, and there never will be one again.
So it will happen, but --
I'm afraid -- only after the rattlesnake bites us. So we are going to
have to have a real energy disaster strike us, before the system will
bend and get at what has to be done.
As an aside, the weather
engineering going on over our heads is particularly fierce this year.
Huntsville is a "turning point" used to turn the jet streams that have
been pulled way down south, so they turn and run parallel to the
eastern coastline. So we see a great deal of the weather engineering
here. Lately I've often seen three tiers of engineering at once, with
a huge twin giant radial cloud in the lower cloud layer, a single
giant radial of very large size in the middle layer, oriented at
almost right angles to the first one, and then high above all of it in
the top cloud layer a large network of interference pattern resembling
a "cross-ploughed field" or grid pattern.
What such fierce
engineering usually means is that they are going to give us a very bad
winter, and really hit the old heartland U.S. hard.
Anyway, good luck to you
in your own research, and please hang in there.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
|