| Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 22:35:42
-0600
Dear Gary,
Thanks for the kind
words, and I'm glad you find the material of interest.
As for the
universities: My advice is, if you can go to university and finish it,
please do so. Just learn the physics etc. as it is taught (after all,
those models DO work okay for an awful lot of very useful things!) But
keep your mind open, and remember you are learning the best model they
have, the way they see it. Nothing at all wrong with that.
The only problem is
when scientists begin to assume they have PERFECT models. We already
know from the Godel theorem alone, that no model is perfect. A model is
USEFUL or it is not USEFUL. It may be quite useful for many things, and
fail miserably for others (all models, including my own, e.g., do that).
So we are not trying
to find the "perfect" model. Just one (or several) that are more useful
than the conventional models, and will therefore allow us to do things
we presently are unable to do, and have a more advanced technology than
we presently are able to have.
My advice to all the
students I write to, is not to argue or debate with the professors!
Just take what they give you and help you learn and achieve, and once
you have the tools, then redo some things yourself.
The work will go on,
whether I'm alive or not. The purpose of the website is to get the
information out there, so that those parts of it that are found useful
need not have to be rediscovered painfully by others. Those parts that
prove in error, should of course be discarded or corrected.
The forum notion is
not useful to my purpose. In a chat board etc., suddenly you find all
sorts of ad hominem attacks, heated defenses of dogma, all sorts of ego
trips and posturing, the works. The internet is already filled with
plenty of that. My purpose, during the time I have left, and through
the good graces of Mike Reiker and Tony Craddock, is to get everything
up there, so it's available to anyone interested. At that point,
essentially my work will be finished. Hopefully, we will also get a
COP>1.0 EM power system on the world market about a year from now, and
also hopefully we will at least get the medical work started.
I'm also working (on
my presently necessarily limited schedule) on a book which will be
published next year by World Scientific, and thus will sit on the
library shelves of a great many universities. In that book, we will
reveal just about everything we know about extracting EM energy from the
vacuum, how to grab a system in disequilibrium before it decays back to
equilibrium and thus back to COP<1.0, lock it into that excited
position, and hold it there for stable COP>1.0 operation. Also, we will
reveal how to close-loop a COP>1.0 system for self-powering. That is a
formidable task, quite complex, and not at all the simple matter that
most of the "overunity community" believes it to be. We will also
include our proposed solution to the cold fusion reactions, why those
reactions occur, precisely how they occur, and give the precise new
nuclear reactions producing the alpha particles, excess deuterium, the
tritium, etc. A lot more will also be in there. We are about 2/3
through with the book now, and still working on it as much as we can.
Meanwhile, the higher
group symmetry EM -- under its pioneers such as Evans, Barrett, Harmuth,
and many others --- is now very firmly in the literature, as is EM
energy from the vacuum. If we can get the medical information headed
into the literature in similar fashion, then that will finish it up for
this old dog.
For a single "good
book" to dig into, written for the layperson, try Paul C. W. Davies,
Ed.,
The New
Physics,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1989. This book, with
papers by many excellent scientists, is a sweeping, expert survey of
the newer developments in modern physics, including many of the major
topics at the frontiers of fundamental research.
My best wishes to you
in your continued work, in whatever direction,
Tom Bearden
|