Help support the research

Larry,   

Mind operations are totally electromagnetic, but just employing time-polarized EM waves and time-polarized (scalar) photons. Electrical engineering does not use these at all, but they appear in quantum field theory.  The common old scalar potential (voltage), e.g., is a combination of time-polarized EM waves (energy oscillating in the time domain) and longitudinal EM waves in 3-space.  Neither wave of itself is individually observable A strong argument for the combination of the scalar and longitudinal photon being observable as the instantaneous scalar potential is given by Mandl and Shaw, Quantum Field Theory, Wiley, 1984, Chap. 5.   

In 2000 I used this fact to finally solve the long-vexing problem of the source charge and its associated EM fields and potentials over all space. The charge continuously received EM energy from the time domain, transduces it into 3-space, and in normal language then pours it out continuously in all directions in 3-space.  It appears that the "time-energy to space-energy" transduction is the function of the negative charge, while "space-energy transduction to time-energy" is the function of the positive charge.  If so, then there is a most interesting dual energy circulation loop between space and time, via the negative electrons of the atom to the internal positive charges.  Then if we add the mind-body loops, mind and body actually participate in everything going on in local spacetime, and also with all spacetime subject to that special dynamics.

It follows then that, if there are COHERENT mind (time-polarized EM energy) changes in lots of minds, that coherence will coherently sum over time and will appear as ordered signals in the presence of noise or randomness --- in short, as chaos.  That is because the electrons in detectors detecting the disorder (the randomness) will also be transducing and detecting that coherent presence of sufficient "time-polarized mind electromagnetics" to provide a clear distinction of the overall signal.

This is the old "coming events cast their shadows before" conundrum.  There is a real physics involved.

Once one connects mind operations to time-polarized EM waves and photons, then there is a somewhat straightforward dual mechanism that (1) connects mind operations to the body, and (2) connects body changes to the mind. Both mechanisms are directly engineerable.

This is actually a science already secretly developed to quite an extent by the KGB in Russia, and it is the third branch of energetics, known as psychoenergetics.  For some decades the KGB has used the open Russian academic community to deceive the West into thinking that psychoenergetics is just Western parapsychology.  It isn't, but instead it is a branch of very advanced science all to itself.

Indeed, the hostile use of this science has been tested over and in the United States.  These are the incidents of (1) Captain Button in his A-10 weird flight and crash while under total mind control from a distant KGB weapons complex, (2) about two months later, Captain Svoboda from the same Wing, rising from ordnance delivery at night on a range target, suddenly had her sense of up and down reversed.  Perceiving she was diving, she instantly "corrected" and dove headlong into crash and death.  (3) Captain Hess, out for a morning jog, suddenly veered off, sat down, and began repeatedly stabbing himself right in the torso, several times through the heart, and kept stabbing until he fell over and died.  These were successful weapon demonstrations.  There are probably others.

With the electromagnetics of the mind-body operations, suddenly there is very real physics substance to Jung's collective human unconscious mind and to Gaia, the "collective mind of all the Earth species".  The coherence (such as by Jung's universal forms) fully justifies considering these "levels of mind" as living entities.  And everything communicates in "unconscious" (massively parallel processing) fashion.  Particularly when Kron's n-dimensional networks surrounding any "electrical circuit or action" is considered.  Everything in the universe acts on each mind via that mechanism together with the body-mind coupling loop, and every mind acts on everything in the universe via that mechanism together with the mind-body coupling loop.  Changing a field or potential in the mind-domain (in the fourth Minkowski axis) eventually affects every charge in the universe a little bit.

If enough minds have the same thoughts and "format" and intent, then there exists a coherence in the "many-minds to the detecting charges" of the universe -- at least in that volume of space with a radius equal to the speed of light multiplied by the time since they all gained that coherence.

Further, there are virtual state potentials just as there are observable state potentials.  So changes in the virtual state potentials that are coherent, will coherently add.  When that summation is sufficient to "break the quantum threshold" between virtual and observable, broken symmetry and "detection" occurs.

This period when the coherent signal in the virtual state is growing by coherent summation and continual iteration, I once called "kindling time". It is really a "time-charging" time.

So when there are substantial groups of folks with common intent, particularly vehement and highly conditioned intent, after a period of time those random detectors used by Princeton will indeed begin showing a "kindled extra component".  We briefly sketched out the physics for it (the psychoenergetics).

The subject goes much deeper, but that is sufficient to explain the gist of the causal mechanism generating the Princeton results.

Best wishes,

Tom Bearden

Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:51 PM 

To: Tom Bearden 

Subject: WTC synchronicities

Dear Dr. Bearden,

I thought you might find the article below of interest since it would seem to relate to your letter "WTC synchronicities" of 15 Sept. A.D. 2001
Larry Brown


  MEASURING THE THEORETICALLY IMPOSSIBLE
I am now going to introduce you to something that I have seen discussed nowhere in the major media.  I cannot explain what you are about to read.  I can say that the source is academically impeccable.
For the past four years, researchers at Princeton University have participated in what is known as the Global Consciousness Project.  Before describing the project, let me explain a bit of modern science, as best I can.  Modern science is opposed to any concept of cosmic meaning, unless this meaning is supplied by men.  There is supposedly no cosmic purpose except the purposes of men (or maybe extraterrestrials).  There supposedly is no structure in the external world (assuming that there is an external world) except that which is the product of impersonal natural laws interacting with random events.  (The really hard-nosed followers of Immanuel Kant regard all structure as imposed by the human mind.  But that's a bit far out for most scientists.)
So, scientists seek structure in the cosmos rather than meaning.  Structure is defined as whatever deviates in a statistically significant way from randomness.  If patterns are numerically random, then "there's nothing interesting out there."
So, to conduct good science, a scientist needs a random number generator.  The GCP has over three dozen of them.  They are stationed all over the world.  All day long, they generate random numbers.  From these, the GCP scientists can print out charts.  The charts go up.  Then they go down.  There usually is no significant pattern -- long ups, long downs.
Usually.
September 11 was not usual.  At about 5 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, the generators started throwing off what would later be revealed as non-random patterns of numbers. These numbers peaked -- way, way above random -- at about 11 a.m., after the towers had collapsed.  Their collapse was followed by a collapse in the direction of the charts.
There is a brief summary page where you can see four different charts.  I include this link because the page is fairly short.  It gets right to the point.  All four graphs are visible together.
  http://www.boundaryinstitute.org/randomness.htm
The GCP's site is much more detailed.  It provides more scientific data.  It also provides a summary.  It is clear that the man writing the summary has no answers.  But he has the data and the charts.  He refers to the GCP's random number generators as "eggs."
The following material shows the behavior of the Global Consciousness Project's network of 37 REG devices called "eggs" placed around the world as they responded during various periods of time surrounding September 11.  These eggs generate random data continuously and send it for archiving and analysis to a dedicated server in Princeton, New Jersey, USA.  We analyze the data to determine whether the normally random array of values shows structure correlated with global events.  The underlying motivation for this work is to discover whether there is evidence for an anomalous interaction driving the eggs to non-random behavior.  In a metaphoric sense, we are looking for evidence of a developing global consciousness that might react to events with deep meaning.
The whole world reeled in disbelief and horror as the news of the terrorist attack and the unspeakable tragedy unfolded.  The EGG network registered an unmistakable and profound response.

Introduction
I want to acknowledge that I like the notion of Global Consciousness, but that this idea is really an aesthetic speculation.  I don't think we have real grounds to claim that the statistics and graphs representing the data prove the existence of a global consciousness.  On the other hand, we do have strong evidence of anomalous structure in what should be random data, and clear correlations of these unexplained departures from expectation with well-defined events that are of special importance to people. The events share a common feature, namely, that they engage our attention, and draw us into a common focus.
This is a report of what we see in the data recorded on September 11, 2001 and the surrounding period.  It is the best description we can give of measurements and effects that are essentially mysterious.  We do not know how the correlations that arise between electronic random event generators and human concerns come to be, and yet, the results of our analyses over the past three years repeatedly indicate such correlations.  We cannot explain the presence of stark patterns in data that should be random, nor do we have any way of divining their ultimate meaning, yet there appears to be an important message here.  When we ask why the disaster in New York and Washington and Pennsylvania should appear to be responsible for a strong signal in our world-wide network of instruments designed to generate random noise, there is no obvious answer.  When we look carefully and discover that the eggs might reflect our shock and dismay even before our minds and hearts express it, we confront a still deeper mystery.  This network, which we designed as a metaphoric EEG for the planet, responded as if it were measuring reactions on a planetary scale.  We do not know if there is such a thing as a global consciousness, but if there is, it was moved by the events of September 11, 2001.  It appears that the coherence and intensity of our common reaction created a sustained pulse of order in the random flow of numbers from our instruments. These patterns where there should be none look like reflections of our concentrated focus, as the riveting events drew us from our individual concerns and melded us into an extraordinary coherence.  Maybe we became, briefly, a global consciousness. . . .
It is therefore helpful to examine the larger context by looking at the behavior of the eggs before and after September 11.  We find that while there is nothing unusual in the data from preceding days, the opposite is true following the attacks.  During most of the 11th, 12th, and 13th there is a strong trend indicating correlated behavior among the eggs.  This persistent deviation from random behavior appears to begin a little before the first crash, and it continues well beyond the time specified in the formal prediction.  As it happens, an aftermath of a few hours could not capture what appears in context to be a long-lasting aberration in the normally random flow of data.  The persistent departure from expectation continues for more than two full days.
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/terror.html
After you view the charts on-screen, you may want to print out the full report.  Those of you who are trained scientifically will almost surely want to do this.  What the charts show is that from hours before the attack until days after, random number generators started throwing off non-random numbers.
I mention this because I am convinced that there are forms of communication that are mental that have external effects.  They are called prayers.  These sorts of phenomena are not limited to prayer.  I am convinced that there can be waves of panic fear or euphoria that are not explainable merely by the direct effects of TV reporting, though of course media coverage adds to the "amplitude" of the effects.