| Subject: RE: recent quakes &
volcanoes Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:27:34 -0600
Matt,
No indications
directly as yet. So far, just the fact that it seems to be the most
powerful quake ever to hit the U.S. Also, it damaged the pipeline in
Alaska (800 miles long pipeline) that carries 20% of all domestic U.S.
oil. The pipeline is shut down now, and I haven't a picture yet as to
whether the damage is just minor or substantial. Note we previously
discussed (several times) just how vulnerable that pipeline is.
We also know (100%
certainty) that the Yakuza and Aum Shinrikyo have indeed been
engineering our weather, etc. since 1990, having leased the scalar
interferometers from the Russians (from the KGB, who control and use all
such Russian weapons), on site in Russia at the end of 1989.
We also know that in
1997 SecDef Cohen publicly confirmed that electromagnetic weapons were
being used by hostiles to (1) engineer the weather, (2) initiate
earthquakes, and (3) initiate volcanoes. The confirmation is in the
official transcript of his speech and interactions at a conference in
Georgia. Here is the quotation:
"Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can
alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the
use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out
there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon
other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify
our efforts, and that's why this is so important."
So if it is the Yakuza
and Aum Shinrikyo, one can possibly add a couple of recent volcano
eruptions as possible candidates to their list.
So a shadowy picture
of possible Yakuza activities and involvement does emerge, but not yet
with enough certainty to state it as such.
In intel jargon, there
are not yet enough indicators to be reasonably decisive. But we're
watching it! The game of intelligence includes noticing and keeping and
fitting all the seemingly disparate indicators that eventually fit
together to give the real picture. At five indicators in agreement, you
have a good candidate. At seven in agreement, you have quite a high
probability that it is indeed a legitimate picture. Beyond seven, it
gets to be nearly a certainty.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
|