| The Tom Bearden Website
|
|
|
| Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007
22:12:35 -0500 Hi Daniel,
When a unit gets THAT far along,
no casual investors are needed. One is already ready to reap all the
rewards oneself, and need not share it.
At that point one simply forms a
stock company, and openly demonstrates the working system before the
public on public TV, etc., and the investors arrive in droves to buy
stock – particularly if you are rolling off the assembly line with
units already approved for sale under UL laboratory testing and
approval.
But for the more casual investors,
here are some news to put in one’s pipe and smoke it. There
is no overall model or theory for how one extracts and uses EM energy
from the vacuum. Period. None. Zilch. It isn’t taught
in school. And it does not exist in electrical engineering at all. In
fact, the first thing one has to do, to get usable excess energy from
the vacuum, is to violate the dickens out of electrical engineering.
And the vacuum’s interaction with
a unit is not necessarily the same everywhere. If you are very lucky,
one’s overunity unit will work most everywhere. But sometimes the
inventor will build a type unit that works well in one place, or
several places, where all the local interactions between the local
masses, charges, etc. and the vacuum are “rather normal” or pretty
close. But move that same system to another place where the local
vacuum interaction is different, and the same unit may not work in the
new location, without some very special knowledge. There’s a way to
solve this problem, but we “ain’t giving that one away for free”.
So my advice is for the
casual investors to
just stay out of it till several inventors get these problems licked
and one or more gets “universally functioning” units out there on the
market. Just now, Bedini is in that position, and so are several
persons in things like watergas etc.
Till then, only get interested if
you also will fund the “finishing up” year to two years research –
which takes a team of very good specialists that are very carefully
chosen. Your local university professor doesn’t know diddly about what
has to be done. And electrical engineers don’t even know how a circuit
is powered in the first place (hint! It isn’t by cranking the shaft of
the generator!).
And if the investors are seriously
interested, then FIRE your electrical engineering advisor(s) and get
you some physicists who also know particle physics and at least
quantum field theory, etc. Even then, the physicists themselves have
arbitrarily
gotten rid of negative energy
from their models and textbooks, which was and is a serious error of
major proportion. They did it simply because most of them – including
Dirac and many others -- hated
negative energy with a passion! Negative energy is the dark energy our
astrophysicists are so avidly seeking, and dark matter is the negative
mass-energy source charges for those negative EM energy fields that
comprise negative energy. So if the unit is using negative energy, the
AVERAGE physicist and quantum field theorist will still know nothing
at all about it, and couldn’t advise a flea because he cannot
understand it himself.
If you get involved in one with
negative energy, then read and study (or have your physicists do so)
the work of Dr. Dan Solomon.
That’s the state of the art right
now.
Cheers, Tom
|
