| Subject: RE: sceptics Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 18:58:47 -0500 Dear
          Wayne,  We
          have moved almost all our MEG research overseas. 
          Our first commercial unit should be ready about a year from
          now, and it will just quietly move out into the market.  Don't
          sweat the skeptics.  They
          simply do not know enough physics, nor they even know what actually
          powers the external circuit attached to the generator or battery. 
          It isn't the current and voltage; that is what is being
          dissipated from the circuit.  The
          answer has been in particle physics for nearly a half century, with
          award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang for proving the broken
          symmetry of opposite charges (as in the source dipole between the
          terminals of the generator).  I
          do not have to reprove what has already been rigorously proven in
          physics and the Nobel Prize awarded for its prediction. 
          To such skeptics, one merely tells them to go read the
          literature  and learn some
          physics.  E.g.,
          the Bohren experiment -- which I cite in many papers -- outputs some
          18 times as much energy as one inputs, and any university nonlinear
          optics lab or materials lab can do the experiment, which is already
          published in the hard scientific literature and also independently
          validated, and that validation is published also.  So
          skeptics merely reveal their own ignorance. 
          The same skeptics, in accepting classical EM theory, already
          unwittingly assume that all fields and potentials and their energy,
          reaching across all space, are freely created by their associated
          "source charges".  In
          short, they already accept a model which implicitly assumes that every
          charge and dipole in the universe is the grossest kind of perpetual
          motion machine, freely creating all that EM energy they continually
          pour out in 3-space (with zero input of 3-space energy) at the speed
          of light.  They
          cannot have it both ways.  Either
          the conservation of energy law is dead, as "demonstrated" by
          every charge and dipole (in their accepted model), or else energy is
          input to those charges and dipoles from the time domain (the fourth
          Minkowski axis is all that is left, in the usual 4-space physics). 
          Also, the known (in particle physics, not electrical
          engineering) broken symmetry of the source dipole is already
          recognized to receive its energy from the active vacuum exchange (in
          virtual photon form), transform the energy into real, observable EM
          energy in 3-space, and pour it out in that form as 3-space energy.  Again,
          I do not have to reprove what physics has already proven for nearly a
          half century.  Makes not a
          tinkers dam whether they know it or believe it; all science is
          determined by the experiment, and the overunity experiments and
          examples are there in spades, including every charge and dipole in the
          universe.  We
          went to a foreign nation (to the National Materials Laboratory of that
          nation's National Academy of Sciences) because they already understood
          materials and particle physics as well as the archaic old electrical
          engineering.  They
          understood and use higher symmetry electrodynamics, and for more than
          a dozen years have been teaching it in their universities.  It
          was a real treat to deal with scientists who already know what science
          really says about overunity and about the MEG process. 
          We have not found any laboratory or group in the United States
          with such understanding.  So
          be it.  Cheers, Tom
          Bearden  Subject:
          sceptics some
          sceptics are saying all of this is nonsense. Well, I've seen Dennis
          Lee's tesla machine in operation and I know it works. His sundance
          motor feeds back electricity into the hummingbird generator just as
          you are proposing : 1 unit in = 5 units out. The only question I have
          is the coherency of the magnetic domains in the ferrite crystals : how
          long until they become randomized and you just get a spin glass. In
          other words, is the effect just trading on the original coherency of
          the magnetic grain orientation of the ferrite magnets, or is it true
          vacuum energy tapping? Be as it may, Dennis has suffered greatly at
          the hands of the "big boys" but is still touring the country
          with his energy show. He's out there taking the slings and arrows for
          new energy development, where are you in this horse race? So, if you
          would, let me know if anything new is occurring beyond your finding
          out that your MEG will cut into somebody's corporate profits... 
          W=P  |