| Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001
18:16:26 -0500 Dear
Jay, No,
building and using an overunity EM system is not easy at this stage.
We are still at the primitive stage of understanding,
comparable to where the electrical researchers were when they were
rubbing all those glass rods with cat fur.
So the hard part is now. But
there are plenty of overunity experiments already validated in
physics. The Bohren
experiment, cited in my papers, is one which any nonlinear optics lab
or good materials lab at a university can repeat at will.
Produces about 15 times as much energy out, as one puts in.
We explained where the excess energy comes from. Also,
whether one likes it or not, or even knows it or not (hardly any do),
the free energy experimenter winds up having to work both with
positive energy and negative energy.
Now just try finding any information in the electrical
engineering curriculum on negative energy in overunity circuits, its
phenomenology, and how to use it. Anyway,
quite a few successful overunity devices have been built, and
ruthlessly suppressed. T.
H. Moray had one producing 50 kilowatts from a 55 pound device in the
1930s and early 1940s. It
was suppressed. Tesla of
course put one in an auto and ran it around.
He was never allowed to release it.
Gabriel Kron, working for GE at Stanford University, had a true
negative resistor in the 1930s, which could power the network
analyzer. He was never allowed to reveal its secret, although he
sneaked many hints through the censors if one knows what to look for.
Watson made a fine unit, and he and his entire family suddenly
ceased all communications and dropped out of site.
Several experimenters were killed or "met with a sudden
suicide on the way to the grocery store".
I assure you that any legitimate overunity researcher who has
succeeded, can relate assassination attempts that would curl one's
hair. Marinov was killed
with a longitudinal EM wave "shooter", and thrown from the
top of a building to fake his suicide.
The cement where the body lay "glowed" and emitted
light after the body was removed, quite some time later.
There is only one weapon on earth that will kill the body in
such a fashion that radiation from that body will make cement glow,
and that weapon is in the hands of the "dirty" players in
the international intel community. In
the modern phase (last 15 years), killing the successful inventors has
declined in percentage, while far more sophisticated diversion and
blockage techniques are utilized. So
it is not as simple as going down to Radio Shack, getting a few parts,
and whipping something together.
Heretofore, there has also been no model at all for permissible
overunity electrical systems. Hopefully,
working with the AIAS, we have now mostly solved that problem, and
will completely finish it when we publish our book next year. But
hang around. They lost
control of it when they failed to stop the Internet, and when there
arose computers, laser printers, instant print shops, massive phone
connections, etc. Now the
researchers, if they so wish, can communicate. So
of course they try to jam the media by encouraging lots of false and
misleading information. Such
as the rather silly notion (by folks who never saw an overunity
circuit in their life, much less built one) that close-looping one is
easy. But
all those things are now beginning to fall under the onslaught of a
few courageous theoreticians, such as Barrett, Evans, Harmuth, etc. So
we will get that era of overunity EM systems yet, and I believe we
will get it in my lifetime. Cheers, Tom
Bearden Subject:
Sweet, prototypes, overunity demonstrator Dear
Dr. Tom Bearden and associates, |