| Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003
13:24:15 -0500
Dear David,
Many thanks for the kind words. We're
still hanging in there, and eventually --- one way or the other --- my
associates will get the final development of the MEG financed and
finished, and get it on the market. Without fanfare, the efforts to get
that to happen are continuing. Several other inventors who have real
COP>1.0 EM systems are also struggling to do the same.
This latest massive power blackout is
just a sample of that which is to come in the national energy field.
The various secret EM weapons developments in Russia and elsewhere over
the last several decades have resulted in a very strange state of
affairs: It is now possible to accomplish at will the dissolution of any
and all distant systems, from the large to the quite small. Simply
tickle a few control mechanisms, and the power grid will go berserk.
Its stability is very fragile anyway, and for such a highly nonlinear
system, the overall control is maintained by very fragile means. The
system those fellows have established is a near-perfect example of a
highly nonlinear system far from equilibrium, or one that easily goes
far from equilibrium from small stimuli. It's the old "butterfly"
effect that nonlinear specialists are familiar with.
As such, there are two ways of thinking
about controlling or trying to control such a system: (1) linear means
(which all the electrical engineers have done, primarily), and (2)
nonlinear means. The "linear" disequilibrium system in general tends
back toward equilibrium (stability) anyway and so the major control
philosophy used in this power complex has been linear thinking. On the
other hand, a nonlinear system when driven far from equilibrium, can and
will evolve to one of many new states that are available to it. It can
evolve to a perfectly ordered steady state, e.g., or it can also evolve
to a nearly completely disordered chaotic state filled with wild
oscillations and completely uncontrollable. Thermodynamically, all this
is well known and is discussed very well in Kondepudi and Prigogine,
Modern Thermodynamics:
From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, New York, 1998,
reprinted with corrections 1999. Prigogine, of course, was a great
pioneer in the nonlinear thermodynamics field, and was awarded the Nobel
Prize in 1977.
The present "grid system" thus is
fairly easily driven out of any capability for linear control, given a
proper stimulus. As a result, the "protection" or "control" then
primarily involves abrupt shutdown of threatened or involved powerplants
to "protect the powerplants against being disrupted and damaged or
destroyed, at all costs". So basically the system can "control" some
small surges and swings, etc., and then if such are exceeded it must
abruptly turn off the power plants to protect them. Else the system will
just destroy itself and many of its powerplants as well. Oversimplified
a bit, that is the kind of grid and power system we have.
It's made worse by all the hoopla that
occurred politically on what a great thing deregulation was, and one was
going to break up the large power companies and foister competition,
which would somehow make things lots better and easier and lower costs
as well. So they essentially separated the power production
function from the power marketing function and the power distribution
function, and gosh knows how the "control" of things got separated when
split apart that way. In short, it turned the "power industry" from
something trying to prepare and furnish power responsibly
under a single monolithic company, with full responsibility from
production to delivery, to something with major parts fighting each
other and driven by greedy manipulators using energy like stock futures
and manipulating the markets for gain.
Let me give an analogy. One could make
the same argument about a surgical team. Analogous reasoning would be
something like this: "Why, goodness sakes, one ought to break up the
monopoly (monolithic integrity) of the surgical team so that the
surgeon, the assisting surgical nurses, the anesthetists, the hospital
controlling the room and facilities, and the other support personnel
involved are all independent, bidding against each other in every case,
with little or no effective central direction or control, and
independently maneuvering for financial advantage and making sudden big
bucks off the various surgical operations. Why, my goodness, the old
free enterprise system would obviously make that a superior surgical
team!"
The blunt truth is that, for any
contiguous system to function well, it has to have overall central
control and STRONG central control. In short, it has to be dictatorial.
That's why the military is organized the way it is, and why the orders
and control are quite dictatorial. It won't function effectively any
other way, when the going really gets rough. Any sophomore studying
servomechanism control theory knows that also, from a more technical
aspect.
From that technical aspect, in the
power industry they have gone (been forced) to a system comprised of
many competing servomechanisms, with changing loads and demands, and now
with an uncomfortable degree of decentralized individual control.
And somehow that system is supposed to function "better" than a top-down
control servosystem rigorously forcing all subordinate components and
functions into line. Well, the common servo theory will tell one that
such a mess of individual competing servomechanisms have a neat little
failure mechanism. As various things occur unexpectedly, they also
unexpectedly cause the turning up of the amplification of
the response amplifiers on the various servocomponents affected. So
suddenly one has a "banging and clanging" series of servomechanisms out
of control, fighting each other and with uncontrolled phasing
differences, with the "centralized system" providing inane feedforward
and feedback responses in a hapless control attempt that only makes
matters worse. The end result is that the servomechanism complex rapidly
beats itself to pieces and self-destructs.
In the case of a missile system, e.g.,
it can easily go into self-resonance aerodynamically, with positive
feedback amplification of its own fin commands, and just very rapidly
shake itself to pieces and self-destruct. The old Nike Ajax had such an
effect added into it, which some seconds prior to target intercept
increased the gain of the servoamps controlling the fin movements of the
missile, then just before intercept doubled the servo gain. The missile
then would be flexing aerodynamically as it approached on its target,
and as it entered the first part of endgame it would wiggle even faster
and harder, trying to correct faster, and a few seconds before intercept
it would wiggle frantically like a fish flopping out of the water and
gasping. It would change the fin positions and commands so frequently
that the commands were completely divorced from the missile's delayed
response. As a consequence, the missile would often just self-disrupt
and detonate seconds before it reached the target. This beast was
actually deployed with that severe defect in it, and it supposedly was a
"breakthrough" in improving accuracy! Instead it was a disaster.
To control that silly mess, they had to
modify all the missile systems and add in a "clamp" that simply clamped
the amplifiers at a given level during endgame and would not accept the
"gain control" signals from that "new and greater" system. So a more
sluggish missile was far better, and the hit rate went back up (and the
self-failure rate of the missiles also went down).
Simultaneous feedforward and feedback
in a multiple servomechanism system can be very tricky in a system of
any degree of complexity. Makes it easy for the beast to go into
self-resonance (chaotic oscillations, completely uncontrolled), and
self-destruct.
The power grid mess appears to be in
something very close to that sort of "multiple servomechanism situation
with sluggish and often inadequately control of the feedforward and
feedback signals". Particularly since separating the overall control
responsibility (and thus the effectiveness of the overall control).
Responsible power analysts did warn the U.S. at least two or more years
ago that the power grid was a bomb ticking away to detonate, and that it
was not a matter of "if" but "when".
Anyway, even the older scalar
interferometry weapons confirmed by the SecDef in April 1997 are
sufficient to "tickle" almost any kind of things or stuff in the big
power grid and wash it out, anytime the fellows using those weapons
against us care to do it (old die-hard Communist faction of the KGB,
under its newer name as the Federal Security Services, and the rogue
Japanese team -- Yakuza and Aum Shinrikyo -- who leased the earlier
interferometer sites in Russia from the KGB at the end of 1989). Several
other nations -- including China -- also have them.
So we can expect more "lightning
strikes" on the power grid system, and more "failures of some little
control gadgets here and there" in the system, prompting a safety
shutdown of affected powerplants to save them. The end result is that
the safety circuits trigger the abrupt shutdown of many powerplants, and
the powerplants are saved only at the expense of having sweeping
blackouts of the grid.
All this mess could of course be
avoided if the DoE were interested in vacuum EM energy (which powers the
entire grid system anyway, but which is just ignored by the EEs who use
a model more than a century old, that assumes an inert vacuum and a flat
spacetime, both falsified for what is now approaching a century).
Ah well! After we suffer enough costs
and enough damage, and the people get angry enough and vote out enough
politicians, eventually someone will actually go read why Lee and Yang
were awarded the Nobel Prize in 1957 and why it was awarded at such high
speed. They may even read some quantum field theory, to discover that
the classical notion used by all the electrical engineers of an
"isolated charge in inert space" is false, and really the "charge" is a
special dipolarity (two opposite INFINITE charges, but with a finite
difference, and with the charges in violent and continual energy
exchange with their active vacuum environment). THEN they may even
recognize that, hey, those opposite charges must exhibit Lee and Yang's
broken symmetry, and hence that rigorously means they continuously
absorb virtual photon energy from the seething vacuum, coherently
integrate it into observable photon energy, and re-emit real, observable
photons in all directions. That establishes and continuously
replenishes the associated EM fields and potentials from that "source
charge dipolar ensemble".
Every EM field, EM potential, and joule
of EM energy in the entire power grid comes directly from the local
vacuum, via its interaction with the local charges in that grid. It does
NOT come from cranking the shafts of the generators, or burning the coal
and the oil and gas, or using nuclear fuel rods. As we have stated
before, presently we pay the power companies to have a deliberate, giant
wrestling match inside their own generators, and LOSE.
But for now, DoE, the National Academy
of Sciences, the National Science Foundation, our "great national
laboratories", and every electrical engineering department all use an
archaic electrical power engineering model that does recognize that all
EM fields and potentials and their energy come from their associated
source charges. However, the stupid model erroneously assumes an inert
vacuum (inert space), so it assumes that the source charges do
create and have created every EM field, EM potential, and joule of EM
energy in the universe, right out of nothing at all!
As long as such an assumption is
propagated and defended (and rigorously enforced) by the scientific
establishment, then just so long will we have an energy crisis and
planetary pollution crisis. And the archaic type power systems our
engineers build --- and the enormous grids they build and then find them
messed up with political action and manipulating for profiteering,
--- will just get worse and worse in their behavior, particularly as
those hostile foreign fellows with the interferometers keep "tickling"
the grid now and then, or -- in other words -- poking the rabbit and
watching him jump out of his skin in response.
In April 1997 then Secretary of Defense
Cohen made this statement:
Since then, not a single electrical
engineering department, Department of Energy, or electrical power
industry spokesman has even mentioned that the same weapons systems
confirmed as massively engineering the weather right over our heads
(since 1976) can and will be used to "tickle" and affect the power grid
and lots of other things to make our lives more miserable and gradually
do us more and more financial damage.
The public is being assured by many
pundits called onto the TV screen that "this is not terrorism, and we
have no evidence that.... blah blah blah". Truth is, we haven't got a
single one of those "analysts" poring over all the data that is even
aware of the SecDef's 1997 statement or the continuing operation of
those weapons that killed the Thresher, the Challenger, the Arrow DC-8
in Gander, the TWA-800, etc. Just as we never used any analysts capable
of realizing what was going on in the decades long "microwave radiation"
of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, responsible for health changes and
disease induction in personnel and including responsible for the deaths
of three ambassadors, we will not be using any analysts on the "grid
system problem" that are aware of what kind of terrorism might actually
have been used. Of course it may have been an act of nature. And it
also could have been a deliberate stimulus. The present analysts are
not equipped to even deal with the latter possibility (even probability,
considering that the weapons are there, they are confirmed by a SecDef
himself, etc.).
After manipulating our weather for 27
years, one should not be surprised that the distant interferometers may
start manipulating a few other "contiguous" large systems which are only
fragilely controlled and are subject to easy stimulation for massive
failures and damage. They've given us the forest fires, etc.,
tornadoes, and other nice weather effects to make life miserable.
It would also be a good test of some of
the later KGB systems of quite different design and functioning.
Meanwhile, the great energy consortium
continues along its way, much like the old Titanic that it is, and
headed for the icebergs dead ahead.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
|