| Subject: RE: Technical 
      Papers/Information  Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:25:48 -0500 
          Dear 
          Mr. Pozo, 
           
           
          You 
          have the exact citations for those technical papers; you will have to 
          obtain the papers (e.g., from any good technical university) yourself. 
          A good university library to which you have access, for example, can 
          order them for you. 
           
          In 
          modern physics, anything physical, from elementary particles up to 
          atoms up to molecules up to materials etc., is continually being 
          CREATED AND SUSTAINED as an underlying tremendous set of direct vacuum 
          interactions. The vacuum is not an “emptiness” filled with virtual 
          particles and their activity! Instead, the vacuum IS IDENTICALLY the 
          virtual particles and their ongoing statistical interactions and 
          activities. 
           
          Adding 
          positive energy to the vacuum means adding positive energy to these 
          underlying statistical interactions that “make up” and “create and 
          sustain” everything. So one gets higher and higher (larger and larger) 
          changes and things and entities. This is true, e.g., for a cancer 
          growing in tissue. There are additional POSITIVE vacuum energy 
          interactions and their positive probabilities adding to generate and 
          sustain that cancer. 
           
          So the 
          positive energy vacuum continually “happens”, creates, and sustains 
          everything physical that exists and continues to exist, be it living 
          or dead. 
           
           
          As an 
          example, hold up an empty waterglass in your hand. How do you 
          automatically think of it? You think of it as a real, solid object – 
          very concrete and real – existing in an emptiness. And that is totally 
          false. 
           
          There 
          is no such thing as a hard, solid “waterglass” existing in emptiness, 
          because there is no such thing as an emptiness. That glass is actually 
          an entire set of those underlying and ongoing positive energy virtual 
          vacuum interactions with their positive probabilities. 
           
          In 
          actual modern physics, negative energy also occurs naturally, so it 
          means that the vacuum can also have NEGATIVE energy added to it.  That 
          means that, if we add negative energy to a local vacuum, we introduce 
          the addition of negative probabilities in those ongoing sustaining 
          vacuum/virtual state interactions. 
           
          And so 
          a thing can be “unhappened” this way. Want to cure cancer?  Dr. 
          Kanzius already has a cancer cure process based (unknown to him) on 
          adding negative energy and its negative probabilities to those 
          sustaining interactions continually creating the tissue and additional 
          cancer in it. 
           
          So the 
          highest thing starts “unhappening” first. The cancer starts 
          “unhappening” and just “disappearing”. Dr. Kanzius’ process is being 
          independently pushed forward by two legitimate and separate cancer 
          research institutes. In the phase one animal trials just completed, 
          the process cured all the tumors in the animals 100%.  It is being 
          regarded as the greatest advance in cancer therapy in 100 years. 
           
          He also 
          applied the same process to salt water, where the highest and 
          strongest bond is the O-H bond that is holding together the H-O-H 
          molecule. 
           
          Adding 
          negative energy to the local vacuum in which the water is immersed, 
          starts “unhappening” that O-H bond first. So the water molecules “fall 
          apart” freely into H2 and O2, bubbling up together. They are not 
          explosive while in the negative energy vacuum region because, to be 
          explosive, they would have to form the water molecule’s O-H bond, and 
          that is severely suppressed. 
           
          But one 
          can just pipe the mixture of the bubbling H2 and O2 gases a few inches 
          out of that negative energy vacuum area, into the combustion chamber 
          of an automobile, and there the vacuum is again “normal” (filled with 
          positive energy) and the O-H bond is now easily made. So the gases 
          will now give very nice and smooth combustion to power the car, while 
          emitting only water vapor out of the exhaust. 
           
          Dr. 
          Kanzius had his watergas process tested independently by a world 
          renowned expert in water chemistry. This scientist ran about 50 
          rigorous tests, and at the end he pronounced it the greatest advance 
          in water chemistry in the last 100 years. 
           
          But in 
          the late 1920s and early 1930s, when the new physics revealed the 
          negative energy and the negative probabilities, the leading scientists 
          were astonished at it and very fearful of such a dreadful thing as 
          “unhappening” something sitting there solid. So they ruthlessly and 
          arbitrarily discarded it from physics entirely, including quantum 
          field theory and the Dirac theory. Dirac at first resisted and 
          defended negative energy, because it occurred in his own theory of the 
          electron. But he was so violently and viciously attacked (by Pauli, 
          Heisenberg and many others) that he wound up being forced to help 
          remove negative energy from his own theory! 
           
          But we 
          can solve the oil crisis (fuel crisis) anytime we wish to add back in 
          the negative energy, and start to deliberately apply and use that 
          negative energy vacuum and its negative probabilities to “unhappen” 
          the tightest chemical bonds standing in the way. 
           
          We can 
          also develop cures for all the diseases using the same process. 
           
          It is 
          incredibly easy to induce negative energy into the vacuum! Just fill a 
          region (say, of water) in a given spatial volume with very weak but 
          sharp RF EM pulses. Each pulse is a sharp gradient across a little 
          region of the local vacuum affected. That pops out some “filler” 
          electrons from the local Dirac sea holes, leaving the empty holes 
          which are actually negative mass-energy electrons which – as source 
          charges – produce negative energy photons and EM fields. 
           
           
          So one 
          adds a “negative energy froth” onto the actual structuring and 
          patterning of the local vacuum. In that case, the water molecule’s 
          highest energy bond – the O-H bond – is “unhappened” and falls apart 
          freely, first. And that frees up the H2 and O2 for a ridiculously 
          small input of switching and control energy to make the RF EM pulses 
          “froth”. 
           
           
          For the 
          cancer, the “froth” forms on the exact patterning of the sustaining 
          biological region, and the cancer is the highest energy entity being 
          “created and sustained” by positive vacuum energy and positive 
          probabilities. So the cancer “unhappens” first, thus curing the 
          cancer. 
           
          The 
          process is adaptable for any disease condition. 
           
          Hope 
          this helps you to understand these processes. 
           
          Very 
          best wishes, 
          Tom 
          Bearden 
          
             
          
           
            Deas Mr. Bearden: 
            --------- 
            This is Genaro, and according our 
            conversation on last monday I should appreciate you send me 
            information on the following papers/articles/ topics related to EM 
            energy: 
            a. "On the transfer of energy in the 
            electromagnetic field", by J H Poynting 
            b.  "Electromagnetic Induction and its 
            Propagation", by O. Heaviside 
            c. "On the Forces, Stresses and Fluxes 
            of Energy in the Electromagnetic Field", by O. Heaviside 
            d. "Miles Walker - a Pioneer  at 
            Met-Vick and UM/ST", by E R Laithwaite 
            --------- 
            Some time ago I was trying to ask you 
            this: 
            "Does a unity biological cell (be 
            human, animal, plant) need to be in contact with vacuum in order to 
            accomplish its biological function? 
            in that sense "Should be feasible to 
            talk about the cell  taking  EFTV  to survive? 
            --------- 
              
            Best Regards. 
              GENARO  |