| Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003
19:13:59 -0500
Thanks Ernst!
Two rigorous papers dealing with the MEG
are published in Foundations of Physics Letters. They are:
For the second paper, the refereeing
was particularly
vigorous. A senior member of the board of directors of the company
owning the Foundations of Physics journals objected to the paper on the
grounds that it was forbidden perpetual motion. A rigorous defense was
furnished in rebuttal, entitled "On Permissible COP>1.0 Maxwellian
Systems". Among other things, we cited hard physics experiments that
are replicable and that produce more EM energy out than one oneself
inputs (e.g., negative resonance absorption of the medium). The
referees were very knowledgeable physicists, and fully understood the
rebuttal and its cited references. So the rebuttal was upheld, and the
journal published the article. Another explanation of the MEG, not
quite so highly mathematical, is given in: T. E. Bearden, "Energy from
the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," in M. W.
Evans (Ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, 3-vols.,
Wiley, 2001; Vol. 2, p. 699-776. The 3 vols. comprising a Special
Topic issue as Vol. 119, I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series eds.),
Advances in Chemical Physics,
Wiley, ongoing. Another explanation is given in T. E. Bearden, Energy
from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles, Cheniere Press, 2002, Chapter
7: Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Geometric Phase, and the Motionless
Electromagnetic Generator. In addition, the
AIAS has published some 20 or more
papers in leading physics journals, dealing with extracting EM energy
from the vacuum. Every charge and dipole in the
universe already extracts EM energy from the vacuum, transduces it to
real, observable EM energy, and pours it out in all directions at light
speed, forming the associated EM fields, potentials, and energy. The standard classical
Maxwell-Heaviside equations implicitly assume that every EM field, EM
potential, and joule of EM energy in the universe is freely created by
the associated source charge, right out of nothing at all, in total
violation of the conservation of energy law. Either one must totally
abandon the conservation of energy law, or else one must explain what is
the input of energy to the source charge. The solution to that long vexing
problem is given in T. E. Bearden, T. E. Bearden, "Giant Negentropy from
the Common Dipole," Proceedings of Congress 2000, St. Petersburg,
Russia, Vol. 1, July 2000 , p. 86-98. Also published in Journal of
New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23. Also carried on DoE
restricted website
http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/
and on
www.cheniere.org.
It is also given in my new book, Energy from the Vacuum: concepts and
Principles, Cheniere Press, 2002, Chapter 3: Giant Negentropy, Dark
Energy, Spiral Galaxies and Acceleration of the Expanding Universe. It
is also given in M. W. Evans, T. E. Bearden, and A. Labounsky, "The Most
General Form of the Vector Potential in Electrodynamics," Foundations
of Physics Letters, 15(3), June 2002, p. 245-261.
Very best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Dear Tom,
|