| Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 19:39:18
-0600
Ryan,
Whew! Too many
questions.
Fogal continues to
press to get his chips into production. He has passed several rigorous
tests in several areas, and particularly in removing noise from EM
signals, photos, etc. At least one successful and rigorous test of the
communications showing far less delay than is accounted at the speed of
light, was conducted by an independent group.
Much of the physics
program since 1872 has been driven by Klein geometry and Klein's
Erlanger program. Michael Leyton, however, has originated a new
object-oriented geometry which extends Klein geometry (which is a subset
of Leyton geometry). A beautiful thing emerges from it, both for
Fogal's work, for my proposed solution to the source charge problem, and
for some sweeping corrections and extensions to physics,
electrodynamics, and thermodynamics. In Leyton's geometry, when
symmetry is broken at a given level, it generates a priori a new
symmetry at the next higher level. Further, the new symmetry infolds
all the information of the lower level symmetries and asymmetries. In
short, there emerge hierarchies of symmetry. Among other things, this
would seem to have a startling impact upon signal theory, particularly
with respect to noise in signals. At the proper Leyton symmetry,
information on the noise does exist, exactly. So it does indeed appear
possible to take out all the noise from an EM signal, for photography,
etc. Fogal has shown some very nice results that can only be consistent
with that conclusion. He can indeed remove the noise, without all the
present wrangle about the statistics, etc.
In terms of the source
charge problem, I've roughly applied Leyton's hierarchies of symmetry,
and it does indeed generate all the different levels of symmetries and
asymmetries that I had run into. It does it precisely.
In very preliminary
work on thermodynamics, this appears to show some profound flaws in the
present foundations of thermodynamics, and it appears to offer a
solution to the greatest problem in thermodynamics, that of its
asymmetry. In short, if interactions can only have the entropy remain
the same or increase, then how did the entropy get so low to begin
with? If there are no negative entropy processes, no one has found an
explanation for this yet. In the conventional thermo approach,
something like the Big Bang etc. is just assumed to have provided the
original controlled order, etc. At this point I believe we will be able
to make a case for the direct production of negative entropy. Here some
very profound theoretical work by Evans and Rondoni is key, since they
showed that a nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) system can produce
negative entropy, and that entropy can further decrease toward negative
infinity as time passes. Evans and Rondoni were taken aback at their
own results, and felt that no physical system could do that. However,
being careful scientists, they pointed out that "the problem remained"
for deterministic dissipative systems.
I've nominated the
source charge as a concrete physical system exhibiting precisely that
negative entropy predicted theoretically by Evans and Rondoni. The
source charge in fact consumes positive entropy of the disordered
virtual photon flux of the vacuum, producing symmetry and perfectly
ordered and controlled energy at the next higher level (the macroscopic
fields and potentials associated with that source charge). In short, the
charge absorbs disordered virtual photon energy, and coherently
integrates it into observable photon energy, emitting (dissipating) the
observable photons in all directions, but producing deterministic
external fields and potentials.
Anyway, a quantum
potential is after all a potential, and thus its decomposition by
Whittaker's 1903 paper applies. The resulting bidirectional phase
conjugate longitudinal EM wavepairs are in fact curvatures of
spacetime. By "assembling" a desired set of such wavepairs (desired
curvatures of spacetime) and their dynamics, one assembles a quantum
potential containing an exact "engine" and its dynamics, capable of
acting upon mass at any level (including the nucleons and even the
quarks) and producing any action desired and designed.
With the usual
niceties, the five nations of the world having developed quantum
potential technology have developed it clandestinely and for weapons,
since it is so powerful. QP weapons are in fact the most powerful
weapons on earth.
The Russians (under
the old KGB) developed the first QP weapons, specifically for the
purpose of countering "dead man fuzing". That is a term for the old
practice during the cold war where some nuclear nations clandestinely
inserted nuclear weapons inside the cities and population centers of the
targeted nation they saw as an enemy. Thus if their enemy were to
suddenly attack them with a full nuclear assault and destroy them, their
clandestine weapons served as "dead man fuzing" to still be detonated by
their inserted teams, destroying the nation that had just destroyed
them. In short, a dead man killed his assassin, hence the terminology.
Russia inserted
clandestine weapons into our cities and population centers; simply read
Lunev's book, where he tells you how they were inserted. They also
inserted the Spetznaz teams to detonate the weapons on order. The
weapons and the teams are still there, and the FSS (new name for the
KGB) could produce 100 million U.S. casualties at a moment's notice,
without launching a single missile or nuclear bomber.
Not to worry (the
lunatic says!). Russia was also dead-man fuzed in similar fashion, by
one or more friendly nations. So the old die-hard Communists had a
problem: they could not afford to use a surprise nuclear attack on the
U.S., mostly destroying it, then accept whatever could be launched in
return at Russia, and survive themselves. The dead-man fuzing weapons
would still have destroyed Russia.
Ah, but with a quantum
potential, suppose you insert two engines: One is designed to dud (flip
a quark or two and change the nucleus) of plutonium, and the other is
designed to dud U235. Almost all the nuclear weapons, nuclear submarine
propulsion systems, and nuclear power plants would be dudded by such a
weapon of great power, in from 10 minutes to an hour.
So they developed the
QP weapon for that purpose, deploying it in 1989. Brazil has developed
such QP weapons also, and in early 2002 China also deployed them. Two
other nations friendly to the U.S. also have developed the QP weapons.
So today it's still a
standoff. The FSS (KGB) is not a monolith, but is comprised of two main
factions: (1) the hostile faction, still under the remaining die-hard
old communists, still seeking to destroy the United States, and (2) the
modern younger faction, from which Putin comes, which would like a
rapprochement with the United States, and to become our trusted cheap
oil provider, so appreciable funds would be pumped into the severely
sagging Russian economy.
So, yes, if it were
possible to ever use such developed QP system for peaceful purposes,
cleanup of nuclear wastes would be one of the primary direct uses,
solving a major biospheric problem.
However, that is not
going to happen! The QP weapon is so powerful, that in unrestrained
hands it could easily just destroy every human being on earth, in about
the same 10 minutes to one hour. Not a single one would be missed. It
could also wipe out all life on earth.
So as you can see,
there is simply no way to bell that cat, that anyone knows or can
discover, except by the sheer balance of terror between rational
adversaries. The old "mutual assured destruction" concept.
There is still a
problem, of course. Once such weapons fall into IRRATIONAL hands,
mutual assured destruction vanishes and only assured destruction is
left.
This same dilemma is
also true of any and all powerful weapons of mass destruction,
particular nuclear weapons and some biological warfare weapons (such as
smallpox).
Smallpox
professionally released in a single major city on the planet, will
eventually kill about two billion persons --- nearly one-third of the
human population. Smallpox is in the hands of the terrorists, and is
very likely to be introduced before too long. It's hardly a matter of
if, but of when.
The international
terrorists (political terrorists and religion-driven terrorists) have
their own agenda for destruction of the United States. E.g., Iran is on
the way to acquiring nuclear weapons, legally. The Russians are helping
Iran build a nuclear power reactor. It will be on line about a year from
now (2004). When it has been in operation for one year (2005), it will
have produced enough weapons grade plutonium for 50 nuclear bombs. After
the next two years (2007), Iran will have 150 nuclear bombs. Syria is
considering taking the same route, as are several other nations, some of
whom are terrorist-sponsoring nations. North Korea has already started
back up its nuclear reactor, so it is on the same path.
The point is this: By
as early as three years from now (2006), the international terrorists
(the Al Qaedas etc. of the world) will indeed possess clandestine
nuclear weapons, given to them by their sponsoring nations, in
sufficient quantity and already inserted into U.S. cities, to do
terrible damage to the United States. Certainly within five years (2008)
that capability will be a fait accomplis. And these are irrational
hands.
So sometime between
2007 and 2008, if that scenario is not broken up, the United States will
be suddenly destroyed by the international terrorists, by simply
exploding nuclear weapons in, say, 20 or more of our major cities and
population centers --- in the dirt and dirty. The total casualties,
after all the fall-out, could exceed 100 million.
And that is without
the anthrax and smallpox, which will probably already have been
released.
The Al Qaeda announced
not too long ago that it already has seven nuclear weapons hidden in
U.S. cities -- which may well be true. Certainly when the Soviet economy
collapsed, bringing down the old Soviet Empire, the generals and
soldiers were not being paid. To survive, they simply sold critical
parts of their hardware and systems to the highest bidder. If you had
guts and money, you could buy anything you wished from the Russian
military (which worked in cahoots with the Russian mafia), including a
nuclear submarine. A mobster even bought a Russian nuclear sub, and
hired a Russian admiral. The U.S. discovered the plot and arrested and
jailed the mobster before he could take delivery.
The terrorists had
money, and they had guts. They bought.
These are the kinds of
harsh facts that the President faced after 9/11.
So we are in this war
now, to try to destroy and prevent that scenario. That's what
Afghanistan and Iraq are all about. And those are two battles, not the
entire war.
The "new warfare"
using clandestinely inserted weapons of mass destruction, to attain a
knock-out capability and then suddenly destroy even the most powerful
nation on earth, is called "asymmetric" war.
The problem is that
mutual assured destruction (mutual deterrence) fails when irrational
regimes have the weapons of mass destruction and have attained the
knockout capability.
Asymmetric war
eliminates anything called peace, forever or until we win the war on
terrorism (destroy that scenario), or else lose it. "Peace" and
"dialogue" and "negotiation" are just names for continuing the insertion
phase. We will either win the war or be utterly destroyed by 2008. No
negotiation, no dialogue, no diplomacy changes it one iota. Remember,
there is no such thing as deterrence any longer. In the absence of
deterrence, dialog and diplomacy have always failed, and will always
fail. In the absence of deterrence, there is only continual war, no
peace. After high level briefings a month or so after 9/11, Vice
President Cheney morosely observed:
So there you have it.
Not a pleasant picture at all. But that's what I perceive is really
going on in the world today.
Ironically, we have
been in World War III --- the new "asymmetric" war -- for some time
now. We were dangerously close to losing it, when we finally realized
we were in a war and we had to either get busy or the United States
would be utterly destroyed, as certainly as the sun will rise tomorrow.
Let's hope we win it,
and let us also hope that there occurs some kind of miracle in human
kind, so that asymmetric war and irrational dictators and the insanity
of one human's inhumanity to his or her fellow humans disappears.
We can at least hope,
but history bears out that we cannot expect the latter to happen on our
watch. In that case, we had better be sure we win, for once we lose,
there will be no America left, ever.
Anyway, to try to make
at least some small contribution to the latter hope, we fixed on the
areas of cheap clean energy from the vacuum and a new kind of quick,
clean, medical therapy to be developed (hopefully). So what remaining
years I have left, will be spent in work on those two areas. If the
people of the earth can have a better standard of living (cheap clean
energy is the key), and better medical care to rid them of the present
dread diseases, then perhaps the "irrationality" can be reduced and we
may have at last some chance of the second change in humanity after all.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Dear
Mr Bearden, |