| Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 
      17:42:23 -0600  X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.5390 M:100.0000 C:97.9651 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <soliton@bellsouth.net> [206/10] 
          
          Thanks Chris! 
        
          
          I am not familiar with the 
          405 Hz phenomenon you gave. If "physical" resonance due to size, etc. 
          can be ruled out, then it might be a real anomaly. But unfortunately I 
          have no inkling of what it might represent. 
        
          
          Unfortunately, today -- 
          unless one has tons of money, is a noted publications house, etc. -- 
          one would never get the permissions etc. necessary to publish a series 
          of documents with all those references. So I don't know anyway that a 
          private individual can even hope to accomplish something like that. 
          Hopefully, some day it will be done. 
        
          
          Also, I've not found any 
          way to get the large scientific organizations to even look at as 
          simple a thing as clearly examining and stating what the built-in 
          foundations assumptions are of the various major models being used in 
          physics and engineering. I know of no classical Maxwell-Heaviside text 
          that even discusses the assumptions or lists them, nor do I know of 
          any electrical engineering text that does. I would be delighted, of 
          course, to find one, and perhaps some other reader may have done so. 
        
          
          So we just continue to 
          list and show and reference everything we can on the website, in 
          publications, etc. Eventually we hope that this will reach enough 
          interested young graduate students and post doctoral scientists that 
          gradually the "models" start being subjected to the foundations 
          assumptions analyses so desperately needed. 
        
          
          Some of the glaringly 
          wrong assumptions still in the Classical Maxwell-Heaviside 
          electrodynamics model and in the electrical engineering model are 
          given in my paper, "Precursor Engineering:..." which can be downloaded 
          from the website. 
        
          
          Now if some enterprising 
          young scientist would just do a treatise on the thermodnamics of 
          regauging, and the thermodynamic implications of the gauge freedom 
          axiom, it would fill a very deep need! 
        
          
          And you are quite correct 
          about the rapidly escalating rise in the demand for energy, due 
          to emerging nations, population growth, etc. Quite frankly, unless we 
          do develop cheap, clean energy systems extracting their energy from 
          the vacuum, the dire consequences to the biosphere (and to humanity 
          and other species) is almost certain to occur.  The only debate is how 
          soon. But what once was forecast for the 2050s or so, is now looking 
          more like 2010 or 2015 at the latest. 
        
          
          Best wishes, 
        
          
          Tom Bearden  
        
  |