| Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004
00:59:43 -0600
Dear Jason,
I do not build anything
myself, for I do not do work on the bench. Instead, I work closely
with other inventors who do. My contribution is some 30 years of
intense study of this area and the phenomenology encountered, so
usually I'm able to figure out what a given mechanism is. Fortunately,
I've been able to work with real inventors who made real systems that
did work and demonstrate the phenomenology, for one to puzzle over and
try to find the physics explanation for the effects.
And yes, a permanent
magnet rotary motor was indeed built by Howard Johnson, and I
personally saw it, operated it, played with it for several hours, etc.
Further, Howard himself did know the mechanism, and so he introduced
me to exchange forces, which I vaguely knew of (Feynman mentions them
in his 3 volumes of sophomore physics) but I had never given them much
thought.
But Howard was working in
what today has started being called "spintronics", some 50 years ago!
And he finally did get a set of magnetic assemblies cut just right
etc. so that the exchange forces were evoked at the time and direction
required. Hence that motor did self-rotate and power a load
simultaneously.
Not long after that
success, there was a "mysterious break-in" at Howard's lab and,
amongst about $100 thousand dollars of magnets and magnetic
assemblies, the only thing taken was -- you got it! -- that successful
model.
These days, however,
Howard has finally gotten funding for the high precision machining he
so desperately needed, and I'm looking forward to his success again,
most any day now.
The entire secret of an
all-permanent-magnet motor is that one must have a net nonconservative
magnetic field. The normal field from considering a magnet as a bar
with two opposite poles, on on each end, only produces a conservative
field. That is, when one integrates the force from that field around a
closed path (as in a complete rotation), the overall net force sums to
a vector zero. That motor, with a little friction in the bearings and
a little air drag, will not sustain its rotation, once you kick it
off. It simply runs down and stops.
But if you use specialized
nonlinear magnet assemblies, carefully crafted (be prepared for much
precise measurement and a lot of experimentation and machining!),
which precisely evoke the exchange force at the exact time between
stator and rotor desired, and in the exact direction desired, then
these forces DO NOT integrate as a zero line integral around a closed
path. So that magnetic assembly will self-rotate, and power its load
simultaneously.
It DOES NOT violate the
conservation of energy law, when one gets out of the silly and
horribly antiquated old electrical engineering, and gets into modern
physics. Since 1957, physicists know that any dipole (opposite
charges) such as a permanent magnet represents a broken symmetry in
the exchanges of those magnetic charges (poles) with the active
vacuum. In other words, that permanent magnet continually absorbs
virtual energy from the seething vacuum, coherently integrates it (we
have specified the exact mechanism in other places), and re-emits the
absorbed but integrated energy as real, observable photons in all
directions. The emission of these photons at light speed, therefore
continuously establishes and replenishes the associated magnetic
fields and potentials are light speed.
Now all that is PROVEN in
particle physics, and was experimentally proven by Wu and her
colleagues in February 1957, after Lee and Yang strongly suggested
broken symmetry in 1956-57. So profound a change to physics was it,
that the Nobel Committee with unprecedented speed awarded the Nobel
Prize to Lee and Yang in Dec. 1957 -- the very same year!
In the nearly half century
since then, the impact of the broken symmetry of opposite charges --
i.e., of any dipolarity -- has not been able to migrate across the
campus from the physics department to the electrical engineering
department and get the EE professors to change their now totally
inadequate and seriously flawed EM and EE model. The model erroneously
assumes an inert vacuum (falsified since 1930), a flat spacetime
(falsified since 1916), and a material ether (there are no force
fields in space, contrary to classical M-H EM theory and electrical
engineering). The silly model also assumes that every EM field, EM
potential, and every joule of EM energy in the universe is and has
been freely created out of nothing at all, by the associated source
charges. In short, every EE professor and textbook unwittingly assumes
the total and universal violation of the conservation of energy law,
in the assumptions embedded in the conventional model used.
Try finding ANY EE text
(or paper) that points out the fundamental assumptions in the EE
model. I have not been able to find a single one. Yet in modeling,
that is the FIRST QUESTION one asks in order to evaluate the worth of
the model!
Anyway, a permanent magnet
already continually absorbs virtual energy from the vacuum, coherently
integrates it, and re-emits it as real EM energy. That is already
proven in physics since 1957, but it does not yet even exist in
electrical engineering.
There are no "static" EM
fields in nature, electrical engineering notwithstanding. Instead,
what is called a "static" field around a charge, an electret, a
magnet, or any dipolarity, is rigorously the result of a
nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) system, in thermodynamics terms. As
is well known in the thermodynamics of such systems, such a system is
permitted to exhibit five "magical" functions. It can (1) self-order,
(2) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more energy than the
operator inputs (the excess is freely received from the active
environment), (4) power itself and its load simultaneously (ALL the
energy required is freely received from the active environment, and
(5) exhibit negative entropy, which is closely related to
characteristic (1).
Every charge and every
dipolarity in the universe freely exhibits all five of those "magic
functions" because it is just such a NESS system.
Note that none of the
present EE texts (and I know of no sophomore physics texts that do it
either) discusses the horrible problem of the charge and its
associated EM fields and potentials and their energy. That's because
they never solved the problem, so they just scrubbed it out of the
texts. But read my "Precursor Engineering" paper on my website; and
see the quotes dealing with that subject.
So good luck in your
experimenting. You must (1) have a method of receiving energy freely
from the external environment, and permanent magnetics already do
that. But you must also create a "nonconservative field" nonzero
vector field overall, (the NET field) when the net force is integrated
around a closed curve (as in a rotation).
And that requires either
the Takahashi approach (see my book, Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts
and Principles) or creation of a nonconservative force, as in the
deliberate use and control of evoking exchange forces at various
stations around the rotation loop.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Hello, |