| Subject: RE: Possible lab 
      funding for US lab  Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:51:41 -0600 
        
        Dear Tim, 
        
          
        
        Will forward your 
        E-mail to Dr. Lee Kenny, who controls all MEG negotiations and schedules 
        and is CEO of our little company, Magnetic Energy Ltd.  I'm just one of 
        the technical fellows.  We are engaged in some pressing negotiations 
        with multiple groups at present, so don't know what Lee's schedule and 
        availability, etc. is.  He will have to contact you with regards to 
        that.  Will just have to see if he is interested in pursuing it etc.  
        Our greatest need at the immediate moment is about $50K worth of 
        laboratory equipment, for the special phenomenology and development 
        testing we are engaged in.  We frankly just don't have as yet the $30K 
        scope and $10K power supply we need, etc. 
        
          
        
        We don't reveal the 
        specific foreign nation involved with us on the MEG project; there are 
        some very strange and powerful folks out there who really do not wish 
        any such "energy from the vacuum" project done.  However, there are 
        already English texts in higher symmetry electrodynamics. E.g., see M.W. 
        Evans, "O(3) Electrodynamics," in Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second 
        Edition, 3 Vols., edited by M.W. Evans, Wiley, New York, 2001, Part 2, 
        p. 
        79-267.  
        In the 3 volume set there are several papers by Evans, and many other 
        pertinent papers in higher symmetry electrodynamics.  Evans is seeking a 
        personal grant (should be about $50K) to actually write an entire O(3) 
        textbook for formal publication.  I attach a listing of  the papers in 
        the 3-volume Modern Nonlinear Optics set.  The set can be purchased, 
        e.g., from Amazon. 
          
        
        So far as I'm aware, 
        an individual cannot protect himself from strikes by EM and large scalar 
        EM weapons -- just as one cannot really protect oneself from an atomic 
        bomb strike on his head.  The best "defense" is a capable offense by the 
        nation, which several Western nations do have, and a couple other 
        friendly nations have as well.  Were there not credible deterrents 
        already deployed, we would long ago have been destroyed. 
        
          
        
        The U.S. is definitely 
        not ignoring these weapons, as shown by the SecDef's public statement 
        (quoted elsewhere on this website) in 1997. 
        
          
        
        The AIAS reference for 
        demonstrating the theory of scalar interferometry is M.W. Evans et al., 
        "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic Entity in Vacuo, 
        Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by Scalar 
        Interferometry," Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Winter 1999, p. 
        76-78.  Actually any superpotential theory can do the same, and so 
        different models can be put together, depending upon what kind of 
        potential one wishes to utilize in the weaponry.  The best weapons way 
        is to use longitudinal EM wave interferometry, since good-quality LWs 
        travel easily through the earth and the ocean, with little attenuation.  
        The U.S.S. Thresher was destroyed with such in April 1963, as was the 
        Arrow DC-8 at Gander, Newfoundland on Dec. 12, 1985.  And several other 
        hostile tests against aircraft, missiles, etc. 
        
          
        
        The greatest help with 
        the Priore extension effort would  of course be funding to get on with 
        it (and I can personally sympathize with that, because my own funds are 
        quite limited). Since I can only work about half-schedule now because of 
        medical reasons, one finds that one simply cannot get done what should 
        be done.  Mr. Tony Craddock, who kindly prepares this website, is 
        handling our Priore extension project and the search for funding.  There 
        is a massive briefing of some 119 slides on the Cheniere.org website, 
        regarding that methodology and its promise.  I would envision a 
        multi-staged funding process: (1) first assemble a proper team of 
        scientists with the necessary different disciplines, and prepare a 
        thorough and rigorous exposition of the proposed work in all its 
        aspects, the necessary theory, the medical research support, etc.  Some 
        laboratory work would also be advisable, to build up at least a small 
        and rough prototype to show how the process would be handled in terms of 
        potential equipment embodiment.  (2) Based on this study (which would 
        require about a year, I think), then a detailed project can be laid out 
        quite thoroughly, with schedules, funding and staffing requirements, 
        animal testing requirements, etc.  Major funding would be needed for 
        launching and doing the research to actually accomplish the project.  
        Something like that is what is needed.  I've done the best I can, as one 
        person, and have broken the fundamental mechanism and dramatically 
        extended it.  Now my "limited overview" needs real depth and teeth to be 
        added, by a highly qualified multidisciplinary team (no single scientist 
        has all the required disciplines!). 
        
          
        
        And thanks for the 
        kind words, they are much appreciated. 
        
          
        
        Best wishes, 
        
          
        
        Tom Bearden, Ph.D. 
        
          Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition Edited by M. W. Evans Wiley, New York, 2001 (3-volumes) 
 List of Papers 
 Part I (Volume 1). 
 Ryszard Tanas, "Quantum Noise in Nonlinear Optical Phenomena," p. 1-77. 
 Zgigniew Ficek, "Quantum Interference in Atomic and Molecular Systems," p. 79-154. 
 Adam Miranowicz, Wieslaw Leonski, and Nobuyuki Imoto, "Quantum-Optical States in Finite-Dimensional Hilbert Space. I. General Formalism," p. 155-193. 
 Wieslaw Leonski, and Adam Miranowicz,, "Quantum-Optical States in Finite-Dimensional Hilbert Space. II. State Generation," p. 195-213. 
 Zbigniew Ficek and Ryszard Tanas, "Correlated Superposition States in Two-Atom Systems," p. 215-266. 
 Tadeusz Bancewicz, Yves Le Duff, and Jean-Luc Godet, "Multipolar Polarizabilities from Interaction-Induced Raman Scattering," p. 267-307. 
 V. V. Dodonov, "Nonstationary Casimir Effect and Analytical Solutions for Quantum Fields in Cavities with Moving Boundaries," p. 309-394. 
 Alexander S. Shumovsky, "Quantum Multipole Radiation," p. 395-490. 
 Jiri Bajer, Miloslav Dusek, Jaromir Fiurasek, Zdenek Hradil, Antonin Luks, Vlasta Perinova, Jaroslav Rehacek, Jan Perina, Ondrej Haderka, Martin Hendrych, Jan Perina, Jr., Nobuyuki Imoto, Masato Koashi, and Adam Miranowicz, "Nonlinear Phenomena in Quantum Optics," p. 491-601. 
 David L. Andrews and Philip Allcock, "A Quantum Electrodynamical Foundation for Molecular Photonics," p. 603-675. 
 Mendel Sachs, "Symmetry in Electrodynamics: From Special to General Relativity, Macro to Quantum Domains," p. 677-706. 
 
 Part II (Volume 2). 
 B. Lehnert, "Optical Effects of an Extended Electromagnetic Theory," p. 1-77. 
 M. W. Evans, "O(3) Electrodynamics," p. 79-267. 
 R. Z. Zhdanov and V. I. Lahno, "Symmetry and Exact Solutions of the Maxwell and SU(2) Yang-Mills Equations," p. 269-351. 
 P. Szlachetka and K. Grygiel, "Chaos in Optical Systems," p. 353-427. 
 Boguslaw Broda, "Non-Abelian Stokes Theorem," p. 429-468. 
 M. W. Evans, "The Link Between the Sachs and O(3) Theories of Electrodynamics," p. 469-494. 
 M. W. Evans, "The Link Between the Topological Theory of Ranada and Trueba, The Sachs Theory, and O(3) Electrodynamics," p. 495- 499. 
 J. R. Croca, "Beyond Noncausal Quantum Physics," p. 501-556. 
 Patrick Cornille, "Electrodynamics and Topology," p. 557-611. 
 Carl E. Baum, "Quantum Electrodynamics: Potentials, Gauge Invariance, and Analogy to Classical Electrodynamics," p. 611-638. 
 Thomas E. Bearden, "Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum," p. 639-698. 
 Thomas E. Bearden, "Energy from the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," p. 699-776. 
 
 Part III (Volume 3). 
 M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers, "The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light," p. 1-196. 
 Antonio F. Ranada and Jose L. Trueba, "Topological Electromagnetism with Hidden Nonlinearity," p. 197-253. 
 Nils Abramson, "Ellipsoids in Holography and Relativity," p. 255-295. 
 D. F. Roscoe, "Astrophysics in the Dark: Mach's Principle Lights the Way," p. 297-333. 
 Hector A. Munera, "A Semiclassical Model of the Photon Based on Objective Reality and Containing Longitudinal Field Components," p. 335-385. 
 Pal R. Molnar and Milan Meszaros, "Significance of the Sagnac Effect: Beyond the Contemporary Physics," p. 387-401. 
 Lawrence B. Crowell, "Non-Abelian Electrodynamics: Progress and Problems," p. 403-467. 
 A. Khovanov, D. G. Luchinsky, R. Manella, and P. V. E. McClintock, "Fluctuational Escape and Related Phenomena in Nonlinear Optical Systems," p. 469-524. 
 Donald Reed, "Beltrami Vector Fields in Electrodynamics — a Reason for Reexamining the Structural Foundations of Classical Physics?," p. 525-569. 
 Sisir Roy, "Constancy of Velocity of Light and Stochastic Background," p. 571-621. 
 Harold L. Fox, "Energy for the Future: High-Density Charge Clusters," p. 623-653. 
 Petar K. Anastasovski and David B. Hamilton, "The Superluminal Theory and Effects," p. 655- 681. 
 Fabio Cardone and Roberto Mignani, "Superluminal Effects and Tachyon Theory," p. 683-698. 
 Terence W. Barrett, "Topological Approaches to Electromagnetism," p. 699-734.  |