| Subject: RE: Satellite image
if scalar grid on clouds Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:16:53 -0600
Dear Aaron,
Let me highly
complement you on your research and your persistence. I would encourage
you to start thinking about possibly publishing a book of your findings;
such would, I think, be very valuable to researchers.
Just now I'm
physically limited by moderate to severe hypoxia, on a limited schedule,
and just physically unable to take on any new projects. Were I younger
and in better shape, I would welcome collaborating with you on such a
book, etc.
If you decide to do
such a publication, I will take the time to give you a little write-up
on weather engineering, with the reference to an AIAS paper in a journal
which gives the technical basis for the mechanisms being used.
Basically the weather engineers use scalar or longitudinal EM wave
interferometry, since longitudinal waves travel right through matter,
such as the intervening ocean or earth, with little reaction and little
attenuation. This type of interferometry produces EM fields and energy
in the distant interference zone. Either positive (scattering, or heat)
energy or negative (converging, or cooling) energy can be produced at
will. So the weather engineers can arrange where they heat the air,
expanding it to produce a low pressure footprint on the ground, and
where they cool the air, contracting it to produce a high pressure
footprint on the ground. By making and steering these "highs" and
"lows" that are artificially created over on the other side of the earth
in the target area, they can then deviate and steer the jetstreams at
will. In turn, this allows steering and controlling the weather.
SecDef Cohen confirmed
that such weather engineering is being done, in a speech in 1997 in
Georgia. Direct quote can be furnished. The same thing, he stated, is
also being used to stimulate earthquakes and stimulate volcanoes into
eruption. To stimulate a quake, the interference zone is just focused
in a handy fault zone, and thereby EM energy is steadily deposited in
the piezoelectric rocks. In turn, that slightly expands the rocks and
steadily builds up the mechanical pressure there on the fault zone. If
the pressure is slowly built up, the friction remains essentially static
friction, which is high. When the rocks finally "slip" to give a quake,
it will be a big one (even 9 or 9.5). On the other hand, if the
pressure is more rapidly increased, some of the little parts do little
slippages along the way, giving presaging little temblors. Now much of
the friction becomes dynamic, which is less. So that fault will make
its major slip (produce a quake) of lesser magnitude. Makes a good 3.0
to 5.0 quake, etc. By adjusting, and with a little previous testing,
they can decide just about which magnitude of quake is to be made.
If there are no
convenient fault zones, then they can just pick a zone in the rocks in
the desired locale, build up the energy rapidly, and start getting
shakes and rattles and cracking. Then these cracks are used as
"smaller' fault zones, for the other process, etc.
You can easily see how
the same techniques can be applied to a volcano -- which down underneath
is "sleeping" but active anyway. Fairly straightforward to stimulate an
eruption. Crack a few rocks in the right place, e.g.
Anyway, my sincere
congratulations and appreciation to you on your research. Please keep
it up.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
|