On this slide I show the effects of precession of an electron when it encounters a longitudinal scalar wave that contains "spin vortex holes" for the electrons to fall into and mesh its spin with.
           The basic idea here -- that electron precession accounts for the Hertzian waves in the electron gas in a transmitting antenna and in a receiving antenna, came from my close colleague and friend, Frank Golden, and I am most happy to give him full credit for this important insight.
           As we have previously stated, transverse (force) waves cannot exist in vacuum in the absence of mass.  Hertz waves therefore cannot exist in vacuum, just as Tesla stated. 
          Yet we know that Hertz waves exist in the electron gas in
our transmitting antennas and in the electron gas in our receiving antennas.  How then do we get Hertz waves here, if only longitudinal waves can exist in the vacuum in between?
          Electron precession is the key. 
          We never measure what's happening in vacuum with our instruments.  Instead, almost always we measure what is happening to and in the electron gas in our antenna or probe and feeding current to the instrument. 
          Here we show a "normal" EM vacuum wave -- which is a longitudinal wave containing spin vortexes from the electrons that generated it -- approaching and striking a spinning charged electron.  As the peak and trough of the wave passes, it is as if we had a force pressing against the spinning electron, first along the line of wave travel, and then antiparallel to the wave travel.  (that is, "explaining" it in present concepts.)
          The electron acts as a little gyroscope, and precesses laterally, first in one direction and then the other. 
          Therefore the wave recovered in the electron gas in our receiving antenna or instrument probe is a transverse Hertzian matter wave. 
          Hertz waves are always matter vector waves. 
          Vacuum EM waves are always nonmaterial longitudinal scalar waves. 
          Longitudinal scalar waves in vacuum normally contain many spinning vortex  "holes" of flux, created from the spinning electrons which launched the wave and stayed behind in the transmitting antenna.  This kind of longitudinal wave is directly detectable by a normal free electron charged gas in a receiving antenna or probe.  It also directly interacts with free electrons in a conducting metal shield, and so is shielded by Faraday cages. 
          On the other hand, our zero-vector longitudinal wave, made
by opposing waves, contains opposing spin holes which annihilate or cancel each other. 
           In the absence of spin holes, the longitudinal wave will not mesh with spinning electrons in a conductor, and so it is not detectable in the normal fashion.  It also does not interact with free electrons in a conducting metal shield, so it readily penetrates Faraday cages. 
          An easy way to see that electrons do not interact with that substructured longitudinal zero-vector wave is to visualize both substructure component waves interacting on the electron simultaneously, pushing in opposite directions equally.  In that case the electron tries to precess in both directions, equally, and so it does not precess in either direction.  Therefore it does not "detect" the passing wave. 
          The wave without "golf ball holes", however, is detectable
by any circuit having high nonlinearity actions occurring in it.  Such highly nonlinear dynamic areas act to provide a phase shifting between the composite substructure waves.  This phase shift results in violation of the sum-zero condition, producing a "normal" EM wave which deposits energy in the out-of-phase area. 
             From the spin vortex "golf ball hole" concept, the out-of-phase condition means that now we have an alternating preponderance of spin holes, spinning first in one direction and then in the other.  Thus the electrons in the nonlinear, phase shift area are hooked and oscillated (precessed) to and fro, producing energy.
           Solid state, highly doped transistors are particularly vulnerable to this effect, as are gas discharge tubes, spark and cascade ion discharges, plasmas, etc.

Next Slide