tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post3228259276269580792..comments2017-04-13T04:47:21.148-06:00Comments on Pro Libertate: Blood On Their HandsWilliam N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-27462868983594462472009-11-05T13:32:00.286-07:002009-11-05T13:32:00.286-07:00SHOCKED I TELL YOU, SHOCKED!
Who would have though...SHOCKED I TELL YOU, SHOCKED!<br />Who would have thought the ADL was behind it and the two AJCs. My goodness.<br />COMMISARS preparing a real United Soviet States of Amerika.<br /><br />http://www.adl.org/PresRele/HatCr_51/5512_51.htm<br /><br />http://www.adl.org/PresRele/HatCr_51/Archive.htm<br /><br />http://engage.jewishpublicaffairs.org/t/1686/content.jsp?content_KEY=885<br /><br />http://www.forward.com/articles/10684/<br /><br />http://www.ujc.org/page.aspx?id=95508<br /><br />ON the poor Christians side, you know like the Czar and his family, fighting for 1st Amendment FOR Americans' right to freedom of thought was poor old Reverend Ted Pike, no free trips to Israel for him, no big paydays like Hagee and Robertson and the late unlamented Jerry Falwell.<br /><br />American Conservative Union did NOTHING, what about JBS?<br />GOP even voted for it.<br /><br />Good article on the Middle East and Christian perspective by Rev Pike<br />http://www.truthtellers.org/israel/mideaststrife.htmlFreedom of Speechhttp://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-23460747597663426232009-11-03T19:31:49.441-07:002009-11-03T19:31:49.441-07:00Will, I was just rereading your article and ponder...Will, I was just rereading your article and pondered upon what you said about those folks who push these sorts of FED intrusion into our lives. They seem to be the same sort of boot licking statists who go apoplectic at even the slightest hint of secession. To these collectivist cows it's a return to the Civil War or Nazis hiding in your attic so anyone caught voicing these "opinions" find themselves on the receiving end of venomous diatribes. Freedom , in their bent lexicon, means you have the "right" to shut up and do as you're told.MoThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13996714804361467430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-49989032798037285682009-11-03T19:04:32.040-07:002009-11-03T19:04:32.040-07:00Well, of course. The feds tell you how fast your f...Well, of course. The feds tell you how fast your firearms can discharge, what drugs you purchase, and what plants you cultivate. What's the matter with you? Don't you know the Feds make the grass green?zachnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-75626640550325859522009-11-03T16:20:46.353-07:002009-11-03T16:20:46.353-07:00Some folk must still have some genuine faith left ...Some folk must still have some <i>genuine</i> faith left in America, because that's what it must be since the manifest evidence I observe all around doesn't inspire any faith in my mind at all. I harbor absolutely zero faith in this country anymore. My cynicism and skepticism are at all time highs.<br /><br />I've noticed many people talk negatively about nationalism, but I've never particularly had any issue with nationalism, per se, as if it's some kind of hellish -<i>ism</i> -- i.e. totalitarian<i>ism</i> -- as some seem to view it, Will included. Providence is the one who created the concept of nations and it's completely natural for <i>homogenous</i> folk to harbor some flavor of nationalism, to be a nation unto themselves. Do cunning authoritarians capitalize on and make good use of that trait? Absolutely, just as they do with any other available avenue toward the ultimate end - total power and complete cotrol. Even so, that's not an indictment on "nationalism" but rather on undiscerning, rudderless minds that can be easily manipulated. Yes, most folk do fall under that curse; we <i>all</i> do, or did, at one point in life or another.<br /><br />Most other countries, even though some have sizeable minorities to be sure, are largely <i>homogenous</i> and not a concocted farrago like America. I suppose Providence had His specific purpose for its existence (missionaries and <i>private</i> aid to the less fortunate in the world and such), but I think that purpose has just about run its course and we're on the way down. Besides, if you're just goin' to become yet another slime pit of depravity, materialism, and totalitarianism, then there's no reason for a heterogenous farrago nation to even exist in the first place. In fact, without Providence, it won't exist peacefully or prosperously. Since we've consciously thrown Providence to the wind time and time again, we're payin' the hefty price - culturally, economically, socially, and politically.<br /><br />Back once more to that "evil" nationalism. All one had to do was observe Mexicans, who counter-protested a tiny Nazi (NSM) protest in California recently. They didn't hold up Ami flags, but rather Mexican flags. No surprise there...y-a-w-n! They were simply revealin' their ...[cough]... nationalist innards. Oh my! And the hate displayed was truly "awe-inspiring" and made the tiny NSM faction look "saintly" by comparison. If it all wasn't so tragic in the context of the country at large, it would've been downright comedic to watch. It was, in essence, one group of socialists hatin' on another group of socialists. HAHAHAHAHA! LOL! Bah, down with 'em all. Because I'm "afflicted" with observing just about every event in the context of the big picture, I've grown tired of payin' any <i>serious</i> mind to what amounts to merely petty conflicts within the same ideological and philosophical cage -- whether the "conflicts" are happenin' on the street, in a leviathanette legislature, or in Leviathan's own politburo in the imperial capital.dixiedoghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09845646940134894119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-19999768623289909652009-11-03T16:05:57.263-07:002009-11-03T16:05:57.263-07:00But this sort of thing is to be expected of a syst...<i>But this sort of thing is to be expected of a system in which "justice" is a function of <b>belonging to a government-protected collective</b>.</i><br /><br />Yep, that's the critical aspect. I've long thought that "justice" really means "just [for] us" the commoner folk. This country is in the midst of a moral collapse and arising and radiating out directly from that are all the other ailments (like the ongoing economic insanity perpetrated by both the greedy common folk directly and their power-mongering and likewise greedy ruling representatives directly and indirectly) that plague us and ultimately are goin' to destroy us. Just as blessings can be collectively enjoyed but only rewarded because of the resourceful and righteous actions of a few, so too can curses be collectively agonizing as a reward of the resourceful and nefarious actions of a few.<br /><br />anonymous @ 12:25 PM: <i>If A kills B because B is black, or gay, or Arab, or something else, that goes to motive and intent.</i><br /><br />It's an ominous sign of the level of societal decay to which we've rotted when one observes how conventional and run-of-the-mill it's become to insert a malleable, alterable behavioral trait labeled "gay" into a given mix of otherwise set-in-stone physiological traits like race, ethnicity, and so on.<br /><br />The problem with this is that motive for said deed, rather than the deed itself, becomes the nexus of everything rather than merely just a means of solidifying already existing evidence that the alleged crime was committed by the alleged perpetrator.<br /><br />It's already real simple: If one kills anyone (except, of course, the womb-dwellers since their premeditated demise has long been fully sanctioned by Leviathan) with willful intent (premeditation), it's already first-degree murder (or capital murder in some states like Virginia if the homicide charge in question is deemed to warrant a sentence of death). Yeah, the latter is a whole other problem topic, but not the point here.<br /><br />Anyway, the <i>purposely</i> arbitrary "hate" aspect (a nebulous thought which obviously cannot be conclusively proven) -- when attached to an alleged clear-cut crime (an unambiguous action) -- adds a fiery and whimsical appetizer to the already well-defined menu of main course punishments for crimes (actions) perpetrated.dixiedoghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09845646940134894119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-2475961085168472202009-11-03T09:26:02.910-07:002009-11-03T09:26:02.910-07:00"There are myriad sound reasons why states sh..."There are myriad sound reasons why states shouldn't enact hate crimes laws, but they're constitutionally free to do so. The newly enacted federal measure, on the other hand, is facially incompatible with the assignment of powers described by Madison and required by the 10th Amendment precisely because it would permit federal intervention in criminal matters that fall entirely within the innate jurisdiction of the states."<br /><br />With respect to the above from your article, as well as the reality revealed to us daily, I have two quotes:<br /><br />The first quote is from none other than her majesty, Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the house and third in line to the presidency, when asked for the CONSTITUTIONAL provision for fedgov health care:<br /><br />"Are you serious? Are you serious?" <br /><br />Now, let's go to the "other side" (a convenient ignorance affecting those who believe there is a difference between the authoritarian right and the enabling left), and quote none other than "W", the "conservative" president, with respect to the Constitution:<br /><br />"It's just a goddamned piece of paper." <br /><br />The people elected these trolls thinking there is a difference between democrats and republicans, but P. Buchanan was correct in his assessment that "these are just the right and left wings of the same bird of prey" and the policies of both reveal Buchanan to be absolutely correct. It still astounds me that the vast majority of the public can be so very blind and not elect a third party candidate by an astounding margin. Does this outcome, despite revelations of gangsterism on both sides, reveal the degree to which the amerikan people have been bought and paid for?<br /><br />In the end, there is only one facet to voting that should always remain: NEVER VOTE FOR AN INCUMBENT, even if "your boy" brings home the bacon. Remember: he had to first STEAL the bacon from someone else.<br /><br />HATE CRIMES is foisted on us by those who HATE US ALL and do not want that emotion visited back upon them as they, newly emboldened, will be in our faces everywhere, making demands of us, whether we invite them to do so or not. Defending yourself from their onslaught will be the crime. <br /><br />Ain't amerika grand??kirknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-25930554883992805322009-11-03T01:45:47.680-07:002009-11-03T01:45:47.680-07:00Briefly indulging the winsome fantasy that the Con...<i>Briefly indulging the winsome fantasy that the Constitution is in some way relevant to the actions of the government ruling us, we dust off Federalist #45…</i><br /><br />It's inspiring that you can inject humor into such disturbing matters.Isaac Stanfieldhttp://thestanfielddoctrine.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-40926492403789586332009-11-03T00:20:21.391-07:002009-11-03T00:20:21.391-07:00"Briefly indulging the winsome fantasy that t..."Briefly indulging the winsome fantasy that the Constitution is in some way relevant to the actions of the government ruling us"...<br /><br />Touche' I'm saddened time and again that those who lie to us daily claim they uphold the Constitution but to witness those poor children suffer because of this nations callous disregard for truth and decency tells me that its all a fiction. Poetic words they may be but in truth the equivalent of pearls before the swine we have in charge.MoThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13996714804361467430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-41819721593211162232009-11-02T20:37:56.646-07:002009-11-02T20:37:56.646-07:00Another good piece of journalism Will, Thanks.
Th...Another good piece of journalism Will, Thanks.<br /><br />Those are some very difficult pictures to look at - which I presume is the point. They are by no means the first or worst that I've seen of our imperial death machine and they are just as hard to stomach as the first.<br /><br />It never ceases to amaze me that we (you and I) live in a state with such great people who engage in the disgusting practice of nationalism (or -ism's in general, as you know my bent on issues). <br /><br />We jail people for lesser cruelties to animals than for the cuelties we inflict abroad on "those people" in all our names.<br /><br />It is little wonder that the images of reality in Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan never make it to the amerikan 'boob tube', a lesson learned by the puppet masters from Vietnam I suppose. (As a side note, just this weekend I picked up a Buffalo Springfield cd just for the song "For What It's Worth". A bit of nostalgia perhaps and might make one of your video links, who knows. Still seems rather timely though it may be a bit before your time . . .).<br /><br />As far as piggy-backing the hate crimes onto the defense spending bill, that's just what has become gov't as usual. A slight of hand, an obfuscation, another layer of bureaucracy to distract all but the most observant in such matters. A practice that has destroyed our society and one for which the willfully ignorant and the self-serving tax feeders owe a debt to the rest of us . . .<br /><br />Make no mistake, the goal is to first criminalize as many as possible and, then with the support of the sheeple, disarm us for 'security' reasons. It matters not whether through hate crimes, family court or some other kangaroo court machination, we all be felons at some point and then with the approval of the sheeple will be de-fanged. Better to hang them all now (got a gov't pay check?) than wait for them to conquer, divide and hang us individually. <br /><br />I think I've got some spare rope somewhere . . . is it time for a party?<br /><br />Sic Semper TyrannisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-29149185764345239532009-11-02T13:25:33.114-07:002009-11-02T13:25:33.114-07:00Existing law provides a way to take into considera...Existing law provides a way to take into consideration the motivation for killing a person, for instance. If A kills B because B is black, or gay, or Arab, or something else, that goes to motive and intent. Such intent would be likely to show premeditation, making the killer (quite rightly) guilty of first degree murder instead of another charge. Of course, I'm not saying anything that you don't already know. Good article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com