tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post3007443586052607072..comments2017-04-13T04:47:21.148-06:00Comments on Pro Libertate: "No Hesitation"William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-4777063695293623492013-02-26T22:55:30.424-07:002013-02-26T22:55:30.424-07:00If these were pictures of someone knitting or drin...<i>If these were pictures of someone knitting or drinking lemonade then I would understand the concern but they are threat targets nothing more.</i><br /><br />Ludicrous. Where are the targets picturing cops? It's 100 times more likely that a cop will have just cause to shoot a fellow officer than that he will ever have cause to shoot an 8-year-old boy.will wrightnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-8152859440165991082013-02-26T20:54:32.222-07:002013-02-26T20:54:32.222-07:00Reflexive snarkiness is a poor substitute for read...<i>Reflexive snarkiness is a poor substitute for reading comprehension skills</i><br /><br />But it's par for the course for "anonymous" trolls paid by agencies of the State to disrupt websites dedicated to freedom.<br /><br />Granted, I'm jumping to conclusions here, but I somehow don't think I'm too far off the mark.liberranterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00555275410576294081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-31987567664407533322013-02-25T16:12:18.821-07:002013-02-25T16:12:18.821-07:00I rarely if ever jump to conclusions. For example:...I rarely if ever jump to conclusions. For example: I'm not assuming that just because an anonymous commenter claims to be a building contractor, that he actually pursues that worthwhile occupation.<br /><br />Very early in the article above we find the following statement, which contains a corroborative link: <br /><br />"The company’s marketing team explains that the `non-traditional' targets `were created at the request of police officers and trainers'...."<br /><br />What this means, of course, is that the company didn't create these targets <i>sua sponte</i>; they were made in response to customer demand, and the customers in question were police trainers seeking to break down inhibitions on the part of police officers regarding the use of lethal force against pregnant women, children, and the elderly. They stocked those products because willing customers had requested them, and intended to buy and use them.<br /><br />Reflexive snarkiness is a poor substitute for reading comprehension skills.William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-90606758741877467762013-02-25T11:43:57.515-07:002013-02-25T11:43:57.515-07:00So this company made these targets. I'd like ...So this company made these targets. I'd like to know what agency bought them if any. Is there proof they actually went out to someone? I mean, just because they have a contract with DHS doesn't mean DHS bought this product right?<br /><br />As a building contractor, just because I have an account at a lumber yard doesn't mean I buy 4' 2x4's just because the yard stocks them.<br /><br />Jump to conlcusions often?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-67902124723239235982013-02-24T15:56:02.943-07:002013-02-24T15:56:02.943-07:00"No Hesitation" is a door that swings in..."No Hesitation" is a door that swings in both directions, a door which was better left unopened and locked. As we saw during the hunt for ex-LAPD officer Christopher Dorner and the shooting of 2 occupied vehicles of non-combatants, many LEOs have a "shoot first, fabricate evidence later" mentality. These targets reinforce that mindset while training the next generation of LEOs.Sam Adamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09347583299044561088noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-7114634914296253502013-02-24T08:30:48.569-07:002013-02-24T08:30:48.569-07:00Interesting note:
In the opening battles of the C...Interesting note:<br /><br />In the opening battles of the Civil War the generals observed a troubling revelation:<br />they were collecting 2 to 3 times the number of loaded yet undischarged muskets than<br />those that were actually fired upon the "enemy."<br /><br />How can you win or conduct total war if you can't be sure your troops will kill on<br />command? Thus began what we now know as military desensitization training.<br />Thanks to video games, the average 13 year old has already received the equivalent<br />of a military program several times over. <br /><br />Anyone who is not outraged by the police using paper targets depicting defenseless <br />women and children has already been desensitized by default.<br /><br />Placing a gun in the hand of a child depicted thus does not beg the question of <br />whether a police officer should shoot, it begs the question of <b>why</b> a child<br />would point a gun at a police officer in the first place.<br /><br />As usual, Grigg hits the nail on the head by pointing this out.<br /><br />As for those that accuse him of merchandizing "cop hate," you have to ask yourself,<br />"who are his best customers?" Maybe the paper targets will give you a clue.willbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-56569171665199691312013-02-23T17:09:01.016-07:002013-02-23T17:09:01.016-07:00"What would you have the cops do when a kid, ..."What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old man or a pregnant woman points a gun at them?"<br /><br />Die.<br /><br />Here's a more elaborate answer: If cops want to put their own safety first in all situations (as, "arguably", any normal person would do), then fine, but they get to be treated like any normal person would be when they shoot someone (in which case there will be an awful lot of cops going to prison, and death row). If, on the other hand, they want to claim to be heroes who are putting their lives on the line every day for us (rather than putting our lives on the line every day for themselves, which is what they actually do in the real world), then yes, they need to hesitate before shooting at women (pregnant or not) or children or, for that matter, at men, even when this puts them and their gang brothers at risk. In either case, if they want to be treated as something other than dishonest, unconscionably privileged, and <i>incredibly whiny</i> thugs, then they need to act like something other than privileged, dishonest, whiny thugs.JORnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-28153276226532732172013-02-23T16:47:38.370-07:002013-02-23T16:47:38.370-07:00Have you heard of Sheriff Richard Mack or Oath Kee...<i>Have you heard of Sheriff Richard Mack or Oath Keepers?</i><br /><br />I had the pleasure of speaking at an event with Sheriff Mack in California a few years ago. I'm quite impressed with him, and encouraged by what he's doing. <br /><br />Stewart Rhodes is somebody with whom I've spoken a great deal, and I think he's an immensely bright and talented man. I was delighted when the Oath Keepers held a rally in Tucson to protest the murder of Jose Guerena. <br /><br />The problem is not a paucity of "good cops"; the problem is that those good people eagerly enlist to do objectively bad things -- such as mulcting people at gun point and enforcing patently unconstitutional and utterly immoral "laws" against vice. <br /><br />Only an immeasurably small percentage of what police do has ANYTHING to do with protecting lives and property. An absolute majority of America's prison population -- the largest in the world -- consists of people who have not been convicted of actual crimes of violence or fraud. In this fact we find the most powerful indictment of what the "good" police officers do in our country. Even if none of the abuses about which I write had ever been committed, the system would still be morally unsupportable. <br />William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-70137071490192087342013-02-23T13:45:10.510-07:002013-02-23T13:45:10.510-07:00Will,
Have you heard of Sheriff Richard Mack or ...Will, <br /><br />Have you heard of Sheriff Richard Mack or Oath Keepers? <br /><br />sheriffmack.com<br /><br />I humbley suggest you interview him. It might be good to see some positive things happening with cops all across the country. There are lots of good cops. Check it out please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-40953298043303244542013-02-23T13:24:58.550-07:002013-02-23T13:24:58.550-07:00I look at those targets and I see normal people fa...I look at those targets and I see normal people facing a deadly threat- and preparing to take care of it in an appropriate manner.<br /><br />If we are to pretend that the ridiculous notion of having people be cops is <i>not</i> ridiculous, then the ultimate (in every sense of the word) responsibility of a cop is to die in place of an innocent person. "<a href="http://blog.kentforliberty.com/2012/10/officer-safety.html" rel="nofollow">Officer safety</a>", including the "no more hesitation" targets, doesn't serve that purpose in any way.<br /><br />But yeah, it's too bad that the bad apples among the reavers give the other .00001% a bad name.Kent McManigalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05005964583189815410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-21151163129182366352013-02-23T13:01:47.074-07:002013-02-23T13:01:47.074-07:00everybody pointing a gun in your face is a threat....<i>everybody pointing a gun in your face is a threat.</i><br /><br />As one of your heroic police chiefs pointed out the other day, the reason why police carry guns is to <i>threaten</i> the public, not to protect it:<br /><br />"A gun is not a defensive weapon. That is a myth. A gun is an offensive weapon used to intimidate and used to show power. Police officers do not carry a gun as a defensive weapon to defend themselves or their other [sic] officers. They carry a gun in order to do their job in a safe and effective manner, and face any oppositions [sic] that we may come upon. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZmoHVTtLxA<br /><br />In brief: Police are agents of state-sanctioned aggression who carry guns to "intimidate .. and show power."<br /><br />What that means is that <i>police are a threat to the public.</i> They are, in other words, a standing army of occupation, albeit one that includes the occasional aberrant individual who does commendable things.<br /><br />You're "not ready to give up" on a standing army of occupation. Americans worthy of the title gave up on this kind of thing in 1776. William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-62606416325452881012013-02-23T12:56:19.156-07:002013-02-23T12:56:19.156-07:00Writing about police abuse isn't a matter of p...Writing about police abuse isn't a matter of picking isolated bad apples out of a barrel; it more like gathering manna in a basket, except for the fact that the manna is spoiled. <br /><br /><i>I know hate for cops sells, so does "bad" news about most anything else (just turn on the 6:00 news) but know that usually the bad cops are getting put away by the good cops.</i><br /><br />None of the bad cops depicted in the accounts above has been punished in any way. In many -- if not most -- cases in which cops are punished, it happens after a long and expensive process and generally involves a sentence of unusual leniency. In many jurisdictions, police who are convicted of felonies often keep their pensions, as well. <br /><br />By way of contrast, genuinely conscientious peace officers like Regina Tasca and Ramon Perez who intervene to protect citizens from criminal violence by fellow officers are subject to IMMEDIATE discipline and, usually, expulsion from the force because they're seen as a threat to "officer safety." <br /><br />As to the risible notion that criticism of the police "sells" -- <br /><br />Last night I received an e-mail from a sheriff's deputy -- a functionary who gets paid no less than $50K/year, and probably half again that much, to harass the people upon whose plunder wealth he feeds -- who accused me of making a handsome living as a "police-hater." Last year, as an independent journalist and sole provider for a family of eight, I earned a fraction of what that fellow is paid. <br /><br />I spend much of my time pleading with well-paid people in "mainstream" news outlets to cover the abuses I write about. They resolutely refuse to do so, in large measure because their professional security requires that they be stenographers for the local government, and cheerleaders for that government's costumed enforcers. <br /><br />Police aren't hired by "citizens" and they have no enforceable duty to protect them. The are hired by municipal corporations and accountable only to them. <br /><br />William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-14428507135584539862013-02-23T11:37:16.696-07:002013-02-23T11:37:16.696-07:00"a disposition to see everybody as a threat&q..."a disposition to see everybody as a threat" <br /><br />Correction Will; everybody pointing a gun in your face is a threat.<br /><br />"The police are to the state as the edge is to the knife. The state is a social artifact that claims a monopoly on- the use of aggressive force." <br /><br />Your local police answer to your chief of police who answers to the city council and mayor. Your county deputies answer to your sheriff who answers to the voters and the county commissioners. Perhaps the problem is "we" don't spend enough time with our elected representatives at the city council or county commissioners meetings?<br /><br />"I grant that there are decent people who are employed as police, and allow that your father, as you describe him, was part of that cohort. The institution, however, is irremediably corrupt, and growing ever worse."<br /><br />irremediably corrupt? I think that depends on where you live and how long you (making no assumptions or derogitory remarks)or your fellow citizens have neglected to meet with your elected officials, granted it's a lost cause nationaly but at the local level each one of us should know at the very least our city councilmen and local sheriff on a first name basis. It could be that I live in a very small town but I know from experience, just a couple people complaining to a city council member about anything dealing with our cops gets it dealt with.<br /><br />I think it's way to early to be giving up on our local cops.<br /><br />One more thing Will and then I will back on out of here and let you continue to pick the bad apples out of the barrel.<br /><br />I know hate for cops sells, so does "bad" news about most anything else (just turn on the 6:00 news) but know that usually the bad cops are getting put away by the good cops. When one is arrested there is no story about the ones putting hand cuffs on them, just a focus on the bad one. Like I said earlier, there are thousands of police going about their job the CITIZENS of thier town hired them to do everyday, those that answer the call to a burglary, an assault, rape, murder etc. Only focusing on the bad apples is just like the liberal news media only focusing on all the bad that happens, I know, I know, good news doesn't sell.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-60055092876021535582013-02-23T10:08:36.542-07:002013-02-23T10:08:36.542-07:00You know, the thing that I find most disturbing ab...You know, the thing that I find most disturbing about these targets is that they depict people defending themselves in their own homes.<br />Burrow Owlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-62744544306007397112013-02-23T09:44:38.885-07:002013-02-23T09:44:38.885-07:00I just love when the cop-suckers expose themselves...I just love when the <a href="http://zerogov.com/?p=1897" rel="nofollow">cop-suckers</a> expose themselves.<br /><br />A big problem with these targets is that the people holding the guns don't show an attitude of aggression, but seem to be defensive- except for the little kid who just looks confused. <br /><br />Do you think a cop/reaver is only going to respond to its training when in uniform? Nope. He would shoot and kill an innocent person responding to the same threat he might be responding to. Holding a gun, and having it "at the ready", should not be a capital offense.<br /><br />Add to this the fact that reavers have been known to "mistake" wallets, toys, cell phones, ink pens, and empty hands for a gun pointed at them. With deadly consequences for the innocent person.<br /><br />If I saw an aggressive, armed person in my yard I would take defensive measures. If I saw someone who was apparently responding to a threat they perceived, like those in the targets appear to be- then I shouldn't automatically kill them. I am a self-responsible person. If I make a mistake and die from it, that is still better than me killing an innocent person because I was too anxious to kill.<br /><br />It is better that one hundred cops be killed by failing to act, than for cops to kill even one innocent person by acting incorrectly.<br /><br />If reavers can't handle the "stress" of that responsibility they should turn in their badges.Kent McManigalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05005964583189815410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-88685611218474569442013-02-23T09:00:10.939-07:002013-02-23T09:00:10.939-07:00But these pictures of a person pointing a gun at y...<i>But these pictures of a person pointing a gun at you don't give you options, it's a person pointing a gun at you</i> --<br /><br />-- as part of a contrived training scenario that is intended to cultivate in the minds of the trainee a disposition to see everybody as a threat to that highest and holiest of considerations, "officer safety." <br /><br />Policing, contrary to official propaganda, is not a dangerous occupation. There is not, and most likely never will be, a mass outbreak of shootings in which the perpetrator is a child or a pregnant woman, and the victim a police officer who is simply minding his own business. In contrast, innocent people are shot or otherwise harmed by police every week (if not more frequently). <br /><br />If you're a peace officer who confronts a situation like the one we're discussing, you've already made a moral commitment to something other than "officer safety" -- which means, as Chris suggested, you <i>find</i> another option that doesn't involve simply killing a member of the public you're committed to serve and protect.<br /><br /><i>Right, every cop everywhere is an agent of aggressive violence</i> --<br /><br />The police are to the state as the edge is to the knife. The state is a social artifact that claims a monopoly on the use of aggressive force. <br /><br /><i>you write about a few bad apples while thousands of police officers across this country go about their jobs as peace officers serving and protecting the cizens in their town, every day, just like my Dad did yet you make a living painting all cops with the same brush.</i><br /><br />Find me a comparable number of documented cases in which small children, pregnant women, or elderly people target police, and I'll grant that this critique has some merit. What is genuinely appalling is not merely the number of cases of police abuse -- and they're much more common that you apparently think -- but the fact that genuinely good police officers who intervene to protect citizens against such abuses are thrown out of the service, while abusers generally are not. <br /><br />I grant that there are decent people who are employed as police, and allow that your father, as you describe him, was part of that cohort. The institution, however, is irremediably corrupt, and growing ever worse.William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-18497884144057421732013-02-23T06:50:19.375-07:002013-02-23T06:50:19.375-07:00"What would you have the cops do when a kid, ..."What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old man or a pregnant woman points a gun at them?"<br /><br />Retreat, find cover, resolve the situation peacefully.<br /><br /><br />Not long ago, a nearby county had the sheriff, a couple of deputies, and a couple state troopers on a call. The "criminal" was an old man with a single shot shotgun. The cops when in with their typical attitude. The old man fired his SINGLE SHOT shotgun missing everything but the ground. Instead of these officers rushing him and disarming the guy, they empty their weapons at him. Of course of the tens of rounds fired, they only hit him a couple times. But it was enough to kill him. <br /><br />There are no good cops.<br />Disarm the police for a safer America.<br />All cops lie, all the time.Chris Malloryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13001920155309388738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-66026931376787250552013-02-23T05:36:11.848-07:002013-02-23T05:36:11.848-07:00These are targets with people pointing a gun at yo...These are targets with people pointing a gun at you. If you, a cop or a civilian hesitates when someone is pointing a gun at you then you are dead. Women and children do shoot people. This is a way to get that into the heads of cops because it's not a natural thing. <br /><br />If these were pictures of someone knitting or drinking lemonade then I would understand the concern but they are threat targets nothing more.<br /><br />For some reason (paranoid) because the target pointing the gun at you is pregnant, old or young, people think cops are training to shoot people just because they are pregnant, old or young, weird.<br /><br />If someone points a gun at you they are a threat. You can't go "oh it's a pregnant lady I shouldn't shoot" or "oh it's a kid, I shouldn't shoot".<br /><br />A threat is a threat no matter what. Training to only shoot monsters or rag heads is stupid.<br /><br />That's my take.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-66625744904624911012013-02-23T05:27:54.690-07:002013-02-23T05:27:54.690-07:00What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old...What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old man or a pregnant woman points a gun at them?<br /><br />If the cops are the aggressors, I'd have them yield -- or, if they escalate the situation, die. If they're behaving like street criminals or armed robbers, they should be treated in exactly the same way. <br /><br />You conveniently forgot the other side of the coin Will.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-8238511270465223112013-02-23T05:24:13.930-07:002013-02-23T05:24:13.930-07:00What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old...What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old man or a pregnant woman points a gun at them?<br /><br />"If the cops are the aggressors, I'd have them yield -- or, if they escalate the situation, die. If they're behaving like street criminals or armed robbers, they should be treated in exactly the same way."- Will <br /><br />But these pictures of a person pointing a gun at you don't give you options, it's a person pointing a gun at you. Should cops only train with big ugly looking dudes with guns pointing at them?<br /><br />What would you do if you are carrying concealed on the street or in a business? Hesitate and be shot?<br /><br />"As somebody who is not employed as an agent of aggressive violence, it is difficult for me to imagine a scenario in which I would face the supposed need to kill a child, a pregnant woman, or an elderly person." - Will<br /><br />Right, every cop everywhere is an agent of aggressive violence, you write about a few bad apples while thousands of police officers across this country go about their jobs as peace officers serving and protecting the cizens in their town, every day, just like my Dad did yet you make a living painting all cops with the same brush.<br />If you can't imagine a senario when someone points a gun at you then you are not prepared to defend yourself or your family because kids shoot people, females shoot people.<br /><br />Nothing like over reacting Will.<br /><br />"I take it that my "over-reaction" is manifest by my refusal to see children, pregnant women, and elderly persons as immediate threats to my well-being...?" - Will<br /><br />Not at all, your over reacting in my view is based on your lack of reasoning. You look at the pictures and see a young person, pregnant woman or elderly. You fail to mention the gun pointed at you. But if you did that then you would not be able to continue to stir up paranoia against the police and rile up your followers.<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-83824783401428724002013-02-22T20:38:36.905-07:002013-02-22T20:38:36.905-07:00If you don't like your "public pretender&...If you don't like your "public pretender" then hire a private attorney. Beggars are not choosers any more in the law than in any other areas of life. I guarantee that there are plenty of defense lawyers willing to take a decent case for a fair fee. But the case has to have merit...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-21332575409889350752013-02-22T20:08:15.407-07:002013-02-22T20:08:15.407-07:00"I take it that my "over-reaction" ..."I take it that my "over-reaction" is manifest by my refusal to see children, pregnant women, and elderly persons as immediate threats to my well-being...?"<br /><br />A better question than many may realize. These targets literally are not the kind of people that would point a weapon at another person unless they were under extreme duress. <br /><br />If a LEO believes it is reasonable to purposefully place citizens in such a state and then exacerbate their terroristic behavior by murdering, without hesitation, these victims, it must be concluded that the rule of law no longer exists. <br /><br />This leaves us the uncomfortable choice of taking even further steps to ensure our own safety and security thus further escalating voilent tensions between the LE community and the rest of us.<br /><br />When will the "good" people within law enforcement understand that, for there own safety, these people must be purged from their ranks. They do not seem to understand where this conduct will, inevitably, lead.<br /><br />jkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-55096595158361903302013-02-22T16:50:24.651-07:002013-02-22T16:50:24.651-07:00Do ya notice that all of the targets are white? I ...Do ya notice that all of the targets are white? I wanna credit Eric Peters for pointing this out at http://ericpetersautos.com/2013/02/22/why-are-the-domestic-extremists-all-white/<br /><br />I get that just about nobody in lamestream media has reported on this interesting part of this outrage...<br /><br />Doc Ellis 124Doc Ellishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08543939658083915285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-43741065090979346032013-02-22T15:43:45.962-07:002013-02-22T15:43:45.962-07:00What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old...<i>What would you have the cops do when a kid, an old man or a pregnant woman points a gun at them?</i><br /><br />If the cops are the aggressors, I'd have them yield -- or, if they escalate the situation, die. If they're behaving like street criminals or armed robbers, they should be treated in exactly the same way. <br /><br /><i>What would you do if you are carrying concealed on the street or in a business? Hesitate and be shot?</i><br /><br />As somebody who is not employed as an agent of aggressive violence, it is difficult for me to imagine a scenario in which I would face the supposed need to kill a child, a pregnant woman, or an elderly person.<br /><br /><i>Nothing like over reacting Will.</i><br /><br />I take it that my "over-reaction" is manifest by my refusal to see children, pregnant women, and elderly persons as immediate threats to my well-being...?William N. Grigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14368220509514750246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32869165.post-91175237394950544592013-02-22T14:48:18.520-07:002013-02-22T14:48:18.520-07:00Dear Will,
I am desperately seeking advice and ...Dear Will,<br /><br /> I am desperately seeking advice and help regarding my situation. I've been charged with crimes (felony battery) that I did NOT commit. I am attempting to compel my public pretender to enter evidence into the record establishing (with PROOF) that I had every reason to believe my physical safety was at risk. I am also in possession of video evidence of a local police officer engaged in extra-marital sexual activity with my accuser. I am considering making this video and information available to the public and media - at which point my life will be in danger from police retaliation. I live in one of the most corrupt cities in the United States. I live in fear but I also feel strongly that if I don't stand for justice, no one ever will. I'm posting this as anonymous for now but I will monitor the comment for a response, if any. I have TONS of documented evidence to support my assertion. Is there some way I can contact you about this? Thank you in advance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com