Add new comment

What Part of "Shall NOT be Infringed" Do You NOT Understand?

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 2008-03-24 04:11.

Dennis Wilson at The Libertarian Enterprise - Mr. Wilson reminds us that the reason the Second Amendment says "shall not be infringed", not "shall not be unreasonably infringed" is because it is there to inhibit exactly the tyrants who would love to decide which infringements are "reasonable". He also provided a nice, public-domain, image, which you can buy imprinted on stuff or print yourself.

Which part of 'shall NOT be Infringed' do you NOT understand

( categories: RKBA )

Reply



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will be automatically converted to links
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.