NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1976 guests online.
|
Add new commentNational I.D.Submitted by Kenneth on Mon, 2008-01-21 21:56.
More and more of late I have been hearing about the (National I.D., Real I.D. or more secure driver's licenses). And I must admit I am a bit amazed at the lack of voice in the online forum which is the internet. Unlike the opposition to the amnesty act of 2007 this legislation is moving forward. With the only real opposition shouting that this would be too costly for the states. And indeed it shall be costly but not in the measurement of dollars. For millions of Statesmen the right to travel is a necessity. Transporting foods and goods between states, interacting amongst peers, family and friends. The list goes on and on. For all in the name of terrorism a shift is about to occur for many. In states that are opposing the federal legislation it's citizens will not be allowed to travel outside of that state and it's borders. Never mind the fact that the only reason that the 9/11 terrorist got driver's licenses was because of the failure of the federal government and it's poor passport measures & requirements. "The states who have passed legislation or resolutions objecting to the Real ID Act many due to concerns over the cost - are Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Washington, according to the ACLU." billingsgazette.net My hopes are that enough people discover this blog and want to participate. Together we stand; we can help to try and defeat this treachory. We can help jump start a campaign of phone calls, emails, faxes and protest. To every radio, television, blog, etc. To each and every state to the District of Columbia. We can let our voices be heard. In the meantime stay tuned to this blog to keep up with current legislation & contact information. Special thanks to Bill of billstclair.com for kindly hosting this blog. ( categories: Politics )
Reply |
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 19 hours ago
3 days 1 hour ago
3 days 2 hours ago
1 week 4 hours ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago