NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1639 guests online.
|
Add new commentSave HempSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Fri, 2003-01-31 03:26.
by Bill St. Clair
[I wrote this in response to an email request from savehemp.org, and emailed it off to a bunch of gummint goons. Not that I think writing to congress critters is useful, but I had fun writing it. Savehemp's submission software put in the greeting. I substituted a more appropriate one here.]
12 January, 2001 Congress Critter, I have heard that the DEA intends to make all hemp products illegal, not just illegal, but criminal. This is ridiculous. Hemp is non-psychoactive and very useful. The constitution was written on hemp paper. America's soldiers in World War II used hemp ropes. Anyone who would criminalize hemp is himself a criminal, responsible for the crimes of assault and kidnapping. Kidnapping is a capital offense... Even psychoactive marijuana, the cousin of industrial hemp, should be legal. We should be able to buy it in bulk in the grocery store for a few dollars an ounce. Marijuana is a useful medicine and is nearly harmless, much less harmful than either tobacco or alcohol. In all of recorded history, noone has ever died from an overdose of marijuana. I currently imbibe none of these substances in any quantity, but I have experience with all three, so I know. Even if marijuana or hemp were harmful, government has no place attempting to protect people from themselves. The purpose of government is to preserve individual liberty. If you have forgotten this, read the Declaration of Independence. That document is the soul of America. Don't ever forget it. The war on drugs has nothing to do with drugs. It is a war on freedom, a war on the Bill of Rights, a war on America's soul. End it. Completely. Now. The alternative is civil war. Soon.
Sincerely, add new comment | quote | 1091 reads
Reply |
BlogrollLewRockwell.comQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair Monthly ArchivesTTLB |
Recent comments
22 hours 37 min ago
1 day 1 hour ago
3 days 13 hours ago
3 days 21 hours ago
4 days 4 hours ago
6 days 22 hours ago
1 week 17 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago