NavigationBanners![]()
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 593 guests online.
Online users:
|
Before We Bomb Iraq...Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 2002-02-28 08:00.
From The Federalist:
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. -- Sir Winston S. Churchilland: The best argument for anarchism is the twentieth century. -- Joseph Sobranand: The crucial distinction: a recession exists when your neighbor loses a job; a depression occurs when you lose yours. From kaba: If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun. -- The Dalai Lama Ron Paul - Before We Bomb Iraq... - A speech Dr. Paul gave on the House floor on Tuesday evening. He reminds us once again that the president does not have the authority to send troops to war until Congress has officially declared war. Archived in the Congressional Record via this page - click on the link to the right of "5. CONGRESSIONAL WAR POWER". Mr. Speaker, the war drums are beating, louder and louder. Iraq, Iran, and North Korea have been forewarned. Plans have been laid and, for all we know, already initiated for the overthrow and assassination of Saddam Hussein. Dan DeDelong at jerrypournelle.com - A Tale Of Two Submarines: Why Government Projects Cost So Much - they cost so much because they're government programs. This is the story of two submarines, built for much the same mission. The U.S. government model cost $41 million. The British commercial model cost $750K. [pournelle] The author spent four years designing prototype and one-of-a-kind things for the U.S. Navy as an employee of Westinghouse Ocean Research and Engineering Center in Annapolis, MD. I then went to Perry Oceanographics and spent six years doing similar things for the commercial world. I believe that a similar difference exists between the current space launch industry and what could be done if cost and mission performance were the real priorities. Kevin Whited's Reason Forum - Preaching To The Converted - Mr. Whited thinks that the LP's anti drug war ad in Tuesday's USA Today and Washington Times was a bad idea. I disagree. The war on some drugs epitomizes everything that's wrong with modern government. If people cannot realize that the drug war is absolutely wrong and everyone who has anything to do with waging it is a heinous criminal, liberty is dead. [bluebutton] W. Daniel Hillis at The Long Now Foundation - A Time of Transition the human connection - things are changing so fast right now that they must be plotted on a logarithmic scale. [cowlix] Change was not always like this. For most of human history, parents could expect their grandchildren to grow up in a world much like their own. For most of human history, parents knew what they needed to know to teach their children. Planning for the future was easier then. Architects designed cathedrals that would take centuries to complete. Farmers planted acorns to shade their descendants with oaks. Today, starting a project that would not be completed for century or two would seem odd. Today, any plan more than a year is "long-term". Tibor R. Machan at Laissez Faire Electronic Times - The Transformation of Individual Rights - when the first U.S. revolution occurred, our forefathers believed that the purpose of government was to secure individual liberty. Period. Now that has tranmogrified into the redistribution of wealth. It's way past time to return to our roots. The sooner we understand, however, that this power to regiment others is ill founded, that it rests on a mistaken extrapolation of ideas from one field of study -- the hard sciences -- to all others, including politics and ethics, the more likely it is that all this power-mongering will be abated, eventually. Then we can perhaps begin to fully enjoy the idea that John Locke has developed and the American Founders set into political motion, namely, that the just and good human community is one that protects our individual rights without any compromise at all -- the free society. J.J. Johnson at Sierra Times - Dell: Report and Statement From Sierra Times.com - Dell apologized for cancelling Jack Weigand's order. They were just trying to follow federal anti-terrorism law. And they made a mistake. Really. [sierra] Jack Weigand - Dell Issue - Mr. Weigand's view of Dell's apology. [kaba] I was contacted by a Dell representative this morning a Mr. John Hood. John made the following remarks. add new comment | quote | 1306 reads
|
BlogrollMike VanderboeghQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh Also from The Atlanta Declaration: ... like going to the bathroom, breathing, eating, sleeping, or making love, it turns out that self-defense is a bodily function one cannot safely or effectively delegate to a second party. -- L. Neil Smith This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion. -- Vin Suprynowicz The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
13 hours 38 min ago
3 days 15 hours ago
6 days 8 hours ago
1 week 11 hours ago
1 week 23 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago